Which rehearing petitions still meet the 30-day deadline
Your intake captures the appeals court decision date, whether the ruling came from a panel or the full court, and the case number — and requests a copy of the written decision before a consultation gets booked.
The exact intake your en banc and rehearing petitions leads complete
This is the real 7-question guided intake for En Banc and Rehearing Petitions — the same flow your customers finish before you ever pick up the phone.
What a qualified en banc and rehearing petitions lead should tell you
A petition asking the same appeals court that already ruled to reconsider its decision — either as an en banc review by the full court or a rehearing by the original panel — rather than starting a new case, and one governed by a short, strict filing deadline.
- Trying Challenge Decision From
- Appeals Court Already Issued
- Goal Ask Same Appeals
- It Been 30 Days
- Have Case Number And
- Decision Made By Panel
- Represented By Lawyer This
The questions your team needs answered
Every en banc and rehearing petitions intake asks these — and why each one matters.
| Question | Why it matters |
|---|---|
| Are you trying to challenge a decision from a U.S. appeals court (federal circuit court or a state court of appeals)? | Confirms the underlying ruling came from an actual appeals court rather than a trial court or agency, which is a threshold fit check for this service. |
| Has the appeals court already issued its written decision or order in your case? | A rehearing or en banc petition can't be filed until a written decision or order actually exists, so this separates real leads from callers still awaiting a ruling. |
| Is your goal to ask the same appeals court to reconsider its decision (instead of starting a brand-new case)? | Distinguishes a rehearing request from someone who actually wants to start a new case, which needs a different appellate service entirely. |
| Has it been 30 days or less since the appeals court decision or order was entered? | Most rehearing and en banc deadlines are short and jurisdictional, so how recently the decision was entered is the clearest signal of whether the matter is still filable. |
| Do you have the case number and a copy of the appeals court decision or order? | Having the case number and a copy of the decision means your team can review the actual ruling before the consultation instead of gathering basics on the call. |
| Was the decision made by a panel of judges (not the full court) and you want the full court to review it? | Tells you whether the caller wants full-court en banc review versus a panel rehearing, which changes the procedural posture and standard of review at issue. |
| Are you currently represented by a lawyer for this appeal? | Existing representation lowers fit for a new engagement and often signals a conflict check or referral conversation instead of a standard consultation. |
How Cliont scores en banc and rehearing petitions leads
Every answer is weighted automatically — no manual review required.
Value signals
- Trying Challenge Decision From: yes
- Appeals Court Already Issued: yes
- Goal Ask Same Appeals: yes
- It Been 30 Days: yes
- Have Case Number And: yes
- Decision Made By Panel: yes
Lower-fit signals
- Represented By Lawyer This: no
See the lead your team receives
En Banc Petition Lead
From first click to qualified lead
Follow people and businesses seeking counsel through one smooth, guided flow.
They land & meet you
Your video greeting plays instantly — a real face instead of a blank form.
They explain the matter
Smart questions adapt to their matter and capture the full scope.
They share the documents
The facts, dates, and any paperwork come attached, so you can assess the matter before the consultation.
You get a ready lead
Scored and qualified — waiting for you to win it.
Built for en banc and rehearing petitions workflows
| Cliont capability | En Banc And Rehearing Petitions application |
|---|---|
| Deadline-aware scoring | Uses the 30-day-or-less answer to weight leads higher when they're still inside the typical rehearing window, so time-sensitive petitions surface first in your CRM. |
| Petition-type branching | Separates panel-rehearing requests from en banc requests based on whether the caller says a panel (not the full court) issued the ruling, so you know which motion is actually being asked for. |
| Document readiness capture | Flags whether the caller already has the case number and a copy of the decision or order, letting your team prep for the consultation instead of chasing paperwork on the call. |
| Existing-counsel flag | Marks leads who are currently represented for the appeal as lower fit, helping you route conflict-check or referral cases differently than net-new representation inquiries. |
Common en banc and rehearing petitions lead scenarios
Fresh panel decision, clock running
The appeals court issued its decision within the last 30 days and the caller wants the full court to review a panel ruling — the intake captures the decision date and panel-vs-full-court status so this reaches your CRM as time-sensitive.
Deadline already passed
The decision was entered more than 30 days ago, which lowers the fit score since most rehearing deadlines are jurisdictional — the lead still routes through so you can decide whether an exception applies.
Wants a new case, not reconsideration
The caller answers no to asking the same court to reconsider its ruling, signaling they actually want a fresh appeal — the intake flags the mismatch instead of treating it as a rehearing lead.
Already has appellate counsel
The prospective client is currently represented for the appeal, a lower-fit signal — the intake still records case details but marks this as a lead that likely needs a conflict check before booking.
No paperwork in hand yet
The caller doesn't yet have the case number or a copy of the decision — the intake collects whatever they know and flags the missing documents rather than blocking the submission.
Connect Cliont to your workflow
Send leads
HubSpot, HighLevel, Salesforce, JobNimbus
Book matters
Google Calendar, Outlook Calendar, Calendly
Notify your team
Email, SMS, Slack
Automate follow-up
Zapier, Webhooks, API
Simple, transparent pricing
Choose the plan that works for your business.
Professional
Unlimited intake forms and leads for your growing business.
- Unlimited intake forms
- Custom video greetings
- AI-powered voice bot
- English + Spanish support
- Automatic lead scoring
- Digital estimates & e-signatures
- Photo, video & file upload
- Advanced analytics dashboard
Pay Per Lead
Only pay when you receive a qualified lead.
- Unlimited intake forms
- Custom video greetings
- AI-powered voice bot
- English + Spanish support
- Automatic lead scoring
- Digital estimates & e-signatures
- Photo, video & file upload
- Charged only for submitted leads
More appellate practice intake templates
En Banc and Rehearing Petitions lead-intake FAQs
How does the intake handle the 30-day filing deadline?
The form asks whether it's been 30 days or less since the decision or order was entered, so you can see deadline exposure before the lead lands in your CRM rather than discovering it on the call.
Can the intake tell an en banc request apart from a panel rehearing?
Yes — one question specifically asks whether a panel (not the full court) decided the case and whether the caller wants full-court review, so you know which type of petition is being requested.
What if the caller actually wants to start a new case instead of asking for reconsideration?
The intake asks directly whether the goal is to have the same court reconsider its ruling; a no answer signals they may need a different appellate service, such as filing a new appeal, rather than a rehearing petition.
Does the intake flag callers who already have a lawyer for the appeal?
Yes — existing representation is scored as a lower-fit signal, so you can spot leads that may need a conflict check or referral before you schedule a consultation.
What documents does the intake collect before a consultation is booked?
It asks whether the caller has the case number and a copy of the appeals court's written decision or order, which lets your team review the actual ruling before the first call.
Does the intake confirm the decision came from the right kind of court?
Yes — the first question confirms the ruling came from a federal circuit court or state court of appeals, screening out leads whose underlying decision came from a trial court or agency.
Turn en banc and rehearing petitions visitors into qualified cases
Give every en banc and rehearing petitions visitor a guided intake instead of a dead contact form — and get a scored, qualified lead before you book a consultation.