By the Cliont product team
Negligent security claims intake software for personal injury attorneys

See which security-failure claims are worth a consultation

Ask about the type of attack, the property's security gaps, and how recently it happened, then collect the police report and photos of the scene before anyone books a consultation.

Video greetingGuided intakeDocument uploadInstant lead scoring
Live previewQuestion 1 of 7
Did you get hurt because of a crime or attack (like an assault, robbery, shooting, or stabbing)?
Yes
No

The exact intake your negligent security claims leads complete

This is the real 7-question guided intake for Negligent Security Claims — the same flow your customers finish before you ever pick up the phone.

Preview
Your video greeting plays here

What a qualified negligent security claims lead should tell you

Injury claims arising from a crime committed on someone else's property, where inadequate security measures — such as broken locks, poor lighting, absent guards, or non-working cameras — allegedly allowed the attack to happen.

  • Get Hurt Because Crime
  • This Happen On Someone
  • Believe Property Had Safety
  • Medical Care Or Have
  • This Happen Within Last
  • Identify Property Location And
  • Legally Allowed Be On

The questions your team needs answered

Every negligent security claims intake asks these — and why each one matters.

QuestionWhy it matters
Did you get hurt because of a crime or attack (like an assault, robbery, shooting, or stabbing)?Confirms this is a crime-based injury rather than an accident, which is the threshold requirement for a negligent security theory.
Did this happen on someone else’s property (such as an apartment complex, hotel, bar/club, store, parking lot/garage, or event venue)?Establishes third-party property ownership, since a negligent security claim depends on the property owner's duty to protect visitors.
Do you believe the property had safety problems (for example, broken locks/gates, poor lighting, no security guards, or no working cameras)?Surfaces the specific security defect — locks, lighting, guards, or cameras — that will need to be tied to the crime as its cause.
Did you need medical care or have lasting injuries because of what happened?Confirms the injury led to real medical treatment, separating viable claims from incidents with no compensable harm.
Did this happen within the last 2 years?Flags whether the incident falls inside a typical filing window before staff spend consultation time on it.
Can you identify the property location and who owns or runs it (even if you only know the business name or address)?Checks whether the property can be identified and eventually served, since an unlocatable defendant makes the claim hard to pursue.
Were you legally allowed to be on the property at the time (not trespassing)?Establishes the visitor's legal status on the property, since a trespasser generally has a weaker claim than an invited guest or resident.

How Cliont scores negligent security claims leads

Every answer is weighted automatically — no manual review required.

Value signals

  • Get Hurt Because Crime: yes
  • This Happen On Someone: yes
  • Believe Property Had Safety: yes
  • Medical Care Or Have: yes
  • This Happen Within Last: yes
  • Identify Property Location And: yes

Urgency signals

  • Believe Property Had Safety

See the lead your team receives

Negligent Security Claim Lead

91/100
High Priority
Type of incidentArmed robbery/assault
Property typeApartment complex parking garage
Alleged safety issueNo working cameras, broken gate
Medical careHospitalized, ongoing physical therapy
Date of incident3 months ago
Property identifiedYes, name and address known
Legal status on propertyResident, authorized
Delivered to: Email · CRM · SMS notification

From first click to qualified lead

Follow people and businesses seeking counsel through one smooth, guided flow.

They land & meet you

Your video greeting plays instantly — a real face instead of a blank form.

They explain the matter

Smart questions adapt to their matter and capture the full scope.

They share the documents

The facts, dates, and any paperwork come attached, so you can assess the matter before the consultation.

You get a ready lead

Scored and qualified — waiting for you to win it.

Built for negligent security claims workflows

Cliont capabilityNegligent Security Claims application
Conditional scoring logicWeighs the crime, third-party property, and named security-defect answers together so incidents with a provable failure (broken gate, dead camera, no guard) score noticeably higher than vague ones.
Document upload widgetLets prospective clients attach the police report and photos of the property's security conditions inside the intake, before a free consultation is offered.
Date-of-incident flaggingSurfaces claims that fall outside the typical two-year window so staff can check state statute-of-limitations rules before scheduling time with the client.
CRM routing rulesSends leads that answer yes on crime, third-party property, and security-defect questions straight into the CRM as flagged negligent security matters.

Common negligent security claims lead scenarios

Assault at an unsecured apartment complex

Resident was attacked near a broken security gate with no working cameras and needed hospital care right after the incident — every high-value signal in the intake lands yes, pushing the lead to the top of the queue.

Incident occurred over two years ago

Caller describes an attack from three years back on someone else's property; the date-of-incident answer scores lower, flagging a possible statute-of-limitations issue before staff spend time on it.

Victim was trespassing at the time

Person was in a restricted, employees-only area when attacked rather than a space open to the public, so the legal-status question lowers the fit score even though the crime and injury details are strong.

Can't name the property owner

Injured in a bar-area altercation but doesn't know who manages the building; the intake still records the address and business name while flagging ownership as unconfirmed for follow-up.

Shooting at a nightclub with known security gaps

Guest was shot during a robbery at a club that had no guards or functioning cameras and sustained lasting injuries — the combination of crime, provable security defects, and severity marks this as commercial and urgent.

Connect Cliont to your workflow

Send leads

HubSpot, HighLevel, Salesforce, JobNimbus

Book matters

Google Calendar, Outlook Calendar, Calendly

Notify your team

Email, SMS, Slack

Automate follow-up

Zapier, Webhooks, API

Simple, transparent pricing

Choose the plan that works for your business.

Most popular

Professional

Unlimited intake forms and leads for your growing business.

$397 / month
14-day free trial · Cancel anytime
  • Unlimited intake forms
  • Custom video greetings
  • AI-powered voice bot
  • English + Spanish support
  • Automatic lead scoring
  • Digital estimates & e-signatures
  • Photo, video & file upload
  • Advanced analytics dashboard
Try free for 14 days

Pay Per Lead

Only pay when you receive a qualified lead.

$47 / qualified lead
No setup fees · No monthly fees
  • Unlimited intake forms
  • Custom video greetings
  • AI-powered voice bot
  • English + Spanish support
  • Automatic lead scoring
  • Digital estimates & e-signatures
  • Photo, video & file upload
  • Charged only for submitted leads
Get started

Negligent Security Claims lead-intake FAQs

What if the caller doesn't know who owns or manages the property?

The intake still records whatever is known — a business name, address, or landmark — and flags ownership as unconfirmed so staff can identify the property before or during the consultation.

How does the intake treat incidents that happened more than two years ago?

It doesn't auto-reject the lead — the date question simply scores lower, since statute-of-limitations rules vary by state, and leaves the timing decision to the firm reviewing it.

Does the intake ask whether the person was legally allowed to be on the property?

Yes — a lawful visitor generally has a stronger negligent security claim than someone trespassing, so this answer directly affects the fit score.

What documentation does the intake collect before the consultation?

It's built to request a police report if one was filed, photos of the property's security conditions, and any medical records documenting the injury.

How is this different from a general premises liability intake?

Negligent security intake specifically probes for a crime, third-party property ownership, and named security defects, whereas the Premises Liability intake covers broader hazards like uneven surfaces or spills.

What happens if the caller can't describe a specific security failure?

The safety-problem question still gets recorded as a no, which lowers the score, but the rest of the intake (crime, property, injury, timing) is still captured for the attorney to review.

Turn negligent security claims visitors into qualified cases

Give every negligent security claims visitor a guided intake instead of a dead contact form — and get a scored, qualified lead before you book a consultation.