By the Cliont product team
Toxic exposure and chemical injury lead intake software for personal injury attorneys

Chemical exposure intake that captures injury proof and timing up

Ask whether the exposure happened in the US, whether the person had direct contact with the chemical, and whether a doctor diagnosed the resulting illness — then collect medical records and site or product photos before a claim reaches your CRM.

Video greetingGuided intakeDocument uploadInstant lead scoring
Live previewQuestion 1 of 8
Did the toxic or chemical exposure happen in the United States?
Yes
No

The exact intake your toxic exposure and chemical injuries leads complete

This is the real 8-question guided intake for Toxic Exposure and Chemical Injuries — the same flow your customers finish before you ever pick up the phone.

Preview
Your video greeting plays here

What a qualified toxic exposure and chemical injuries lead should tell you

Personal injury or illness caused by contact with a toxic or hazardous chemical — such as fumes, gas, contaminated water, or industrial dust — where the intake needs to confirm real physical harm, a diagnosed condition, and an identifiable source of exposure.

  • Toxic Or Chemical Exposure
  • Personally Have Contact With
  • Have Physical Injury Or
  • Get Medical Treatment Or
  • Exposure Happen Within Last
  • Identify Product, Company, Employer,
  • Exposed Because Someone Else'S
  • Injury Or Illness Cause

The questions your team needs answered

Every toxic exposure and chemical injuries intake asks these — and why each one matters.

QuestionWhy it matters
Did the toxic or chemical exposure happen in the United States?US jurisdiction determines whether the claim falls under a licensing attorney's authority and legal framework at all.
Did you personally have contact with a toxic chemical (such as fumes, gas, liquid, dust, or contaminated water) that you believe caused harm?Confirms actual personal contact with the chemical rather than secondhand or theoretical concern, which is the core causation element.
Did you have a physical injury or illness that you believe was caused by that exposure (not just worry or fear)?Separates a real diagnosed physical injury from fear of future illness, a distinction that matters heavily in toxic tort claims.
Did you get medical treatment or a medical diagnosis for the injury or illness?A medical diagnosis provides the documented proof a firm needs to support a claim of harm.
Did the exposure happen within the last 3 years?Recent exposure keeps the claim within a workable statute-of-limitations window.
Can you identify the product, company, employer, property, or location you believe caused the exposure?Identifying the product, employer, or property is necessary to name a defendant in the eventual claim.
Were you exposed because of someone else's actions or a product/property condition (not something you intentionally did to yourself)?Confirms the exposure resulted from someone else's conduct or a product/property condition, not a self-inflicted situation with no liable party.
Did the injury or illness cause significant losses (such as medical bills, missed work, ongoing symptoms, or lasting effects)?Quantifies medical bills, lost work, and lasting effects, which drives the potential value of the claim.

How Cliont scores toxic exposure and chemical injuries leads

Every answer is weighted automatically — no manual review required.

Value signals

  • Toxic Or Chemical Exposure: yes
  • Personally Have Contact With: yes
  • Have Physical Injury Or: yes
  • Get Medical Treatment Or: yes
  • Exposure Happen Within Last: yes
  • Identify Product, Company, Employer,: yes

Urgency signals

  • Personally Have Contact With

See the lead your team receives

Toxic Exposure Lead

88/100
High Priority
Exposure LocationUnited States – manufacturing facility
Personal Chemical ContactYes – inhaled fumes over several months
Diagnosed InjuryYes – respiratory illness confirmed by pulmonologist
Exposure Timing14 months ago
Identifiable SourceYes – named employer and chemical product
Losses6 weeks missed work, ongoing treatment
Delivered to: Email · CRM · SMS notification

From first click to qualified lead

Follow people and businesses seeking counsel through one smooth, guided flow.

They land & meet you

Your video greeting plays instantly — a real face instead of a blank form.

They explain the matter

Smart questions adapt to their matter and capture the full scope.

They share the documents

The facts, dates, and any paperwork come attached, so you can assess the matter before the consultation.

You get a ready lead

Scored and qualified — waiting for you to win it.

Built for toxic exposure and chemical injuries workflows

Cliont capabilityToxic Exposure And Chemical Injuries application
Video or text intake widgetLets the prospective client describe the chemical, the setting, and their symptoms in their own words before staff review the file.
Conditional scoring logicAutomatically lowers the score when the exposure happened outside the US or when the client caused their own exposure, instead of routing it toward a consultation.
Document upload captureCollects medical diagnosis records and photos of the product or exposure site tied directly to the diagnosis and source-identification questions.
Lead scoring engineWeights personal chemical contact and third-party fault heavily, since a file missing either has little basis for a toxic tort claim.
CRM routingSends only files with a diagnosed injury and an identifiable source into your active intake queue, tagged for toxic exposure review.

Common toxic exposure and chemical injuries lead scenarios

Workplace chemical exposure

A named employer, direct chemical contact within the last three years, and a confirmed diagnosis push this straight into the high-priority queue with documented losses attached.

Old, undocumented exposure

Exposure happened more than three years ago and was never formally diagnosed, so the intake still collects details but scores it lower for statute-of-limitations review.

Exposure outside the US

The intake flags a 'no' on US jurisdiction early so staff can route or decline the enquiry before offering a consultation slot.

Contact without a diagnosis yet

The prospective client had chemical contact and symptoms but hasn't seen a doctor, so the intake captures the concern while marking treatment status as outstanding.

Unidentifiable source

The person can't name the product, employer, or property responsible, which weakens the ability to name a defendant and lowers the fit score even with a real injury present.

Connect Cliont to your workflow

Send leads

HubSpot, HighLevel, Salesforce, JobNimbus

Book matters

Google Calendar, Outlook Calendar, Calendly

Notify your team

Email, SMS, Slack

Automate follow-up

Zapier, Webhooks, API

Simple, transparent pricing

Choose the plan that works for your business.

Most popular

Professional

Unlimited intake forms and leads for your growing business.

$397 / month
14-day free trial · Cancel anytime
  • Unlimited intake forms
  • Custom video greetings
  • AI-powered voice bot
  • English + Spanish support
  • Automatic lead scoring
  • Digital estimates & e-signatures
  • Photo, video & file upload
  • Advanced analytics dashboard
Try free for 14 days

Pay Per Lead

Only pay when you receive a qualified lead.

$47 / qualified lead
No setup fees · No monthly fees
  • Unlimited intake forms
  • Custom video greetings
  • AI-powered voice bot
  • English + Spanish support
  • Automatic lead scoring
  • Digital estimates & e-signatures
  • Photo, video & file upload
  • Charged only for submitted leads
Get started

Toxic Exposure and Chemical Injuries lead-intake FAQs

How does the intake handle exposures that happened outside the US?

One of the first questions confirms whether the exposure occurred in the US, so firms can immediately see jurisdiction before spending time on a consultation.

What happens if someone reports worry about a chemical but no actual illness?

The catalog specifically separates a diagnosed physical injury or illness from mere concern, and the score reflects that distinction rather than treating fear alone as a qualifying injury.

Can the intake still take enquiries about exposures that happened years ago?

Yes — exposure within the last three years carries more weight, but older exposures still get captured for your team to assess against the relevant statute of limitations.

Does the prospective client need to already know who's responsible?

The intake asks if they can identify the product, employer, property, or company involved, and whether the exposure was caused by someone else rather than self-inflicted, both of which affect the fit score.

What documentation does the intake collect before the file reaches our CRM?

It requests medical diagnosis records and photos of the product, packaging, or exposure site so your team has supporting evidence attached before the first call.

How is this different from your PFAS Contamination or Asbestos and Mesothelioma intakes?

Those sibling intakes ask about specific substances and exposure pathways unique to those cases; this catalog is built for general chemical or toxic exposure where the causing agent isn't already known or litigated.

Turn toxic exposure and chemical injuries visitors into qualified cases

Give every toxic exposure and chemical injuries visitor a guided intake instead of a dead contact form — and get a scored, qualified lead before you book a consultation.