By the Cliont product team
Compliance security program intake for cybersecurity professionals

Know which compliance program leads are worth scoping call time

The intake captures the target framework, current compliance stage, and policy documentation status, then requests prior audit reports before a lead ever reaches your CRM.

Video greetingGuided intakeDocument uploadInstant lead scoring
Live previewQuestion 1 of 6
Which compliance framework or standard are you working toward?
SOC 2
HIPAA
PCI DSS

The exact intake your compliance security program leads complete

This is the real 6-question guided intake for Compliance Security Program — the same flow your customers finish before you ever pick up the phone.

Preview
Your video greeting plays here

What a qualified compliance security program lead should tell you

A structured engagement to build, mature, or prepare a client's security controls for a named compliance framework, certification, or audit, scoped around that framework's requirements and the client's current control maturity.

  • Compliance Framework Or Standard
  • Main Reason This Compliance
  • Have Any Documented Security
  • Current Stage Compliance Effort
  • Authorized Approve Security Policy
  • How Large Organization Or

The questions your team needs answered

Every compliance security program intake asks these — and why each one matters.

QuestionWhy it matters
Which compliance framework or standard are you working toward?Naming a recognized framework like SOC 2, HIPAA, PCI DSS, or ISO 27001 signals a defined, fundable scope, while 'Not sure which one applies' flags a lead who needs framework guidance first.
What is the main reason you need this compliance program now?The stated reason — contract requirement, upcoming audit, regulatory deadline, past incident, or proactive improvement — tells the rep how much runway exists before a decision is forced.
Do you currently have any documented security policies or controls in place?Whether documented policies already exist changes the engagement from a from-scratch build to a gap assessment against existing controls.
What is the current stage of your compliance effort?Stage answers separate a lead that failed a prior audit, the highest-weighted option, from one still in early planning, letting reps prioritize remediation over exploratory calls.
Are you authorized to approve security policy changes for this organization?Confirming policy-approval authority, weighted 10 for yes versus 3 for no, determines whether the scoping call can move toward contracting or needs a decision-maker looped in first.
Approximately how large is the organization or team this program will cover?Segments the lead so you can route, price, and prioritize it correctly.

How Cliont scores compliance security program leads

Every answer is weighted automatically — no manual review required.

Value signals

  • SOC 2
  • HIPAA
  • PCI DSS
  • ISO 27001
  • GDPR/CCPA privacy law
  • NIST framework

Urgency signals

  • Proactive improvement

See the lead your team receives

Compliance Security Program Lead

88/100
High Priority
FrameworkSOC 2
Reason for programCustomer or contract requirement
Documented policies in placeYes
Compliance stagePartially implemented
Authorized to approve policy changesYes
Organization sizeMidsize organization (26-250)
Delivered to: Email · CRM · Calendar

From first click to qualified lead

Follow prospects and clients through one smooth, guided flow.

They land & meet you

Your video greeting plays instantly — a real face instead of a blank form.

They explain the project

Smart questions adapt to their project and capture the full scope.

They share the details

The scope and any documents come attached, so you can scope before the first call.

You get a ready lead

Scored and qualified — waiting for you to win it.

Built for compliance security program workflows

Cliont capabilityCompliance Security Program application
Conditional branchingRoutes a client who answers 'Not sure which one applies' toward framework-clarification handling instead of scoring them as if the framework were already decided.
Weighted scoringWeights SOC 2, HIPAA, PCI DSS, ISO 27001, GDPR/CCPA, and NIST answers above 'Not sure' or 'Other framework,' so framework-committed leads rise to the top of the queue.
Decision-maker flagFlags submissions where the client answers no to being authorized to approve policy changes (weight 3) so reps can identify the real approver before booking the scoping call.
Document uploadCollects existing policy documents and prior audit reports upfront, so the compliance stage answer is backed by artifacts instead of a self-reported label.
CRM routingSends each scored lead into your CRM tagged with framework, stage, and org size, so a scoping call is never booked against a lead that's still deciding which standard applies.

Common compliance security program lead scenarios

Contract-driven SOC 2 push

A client names SOC 2 or ISO 27001 as the framework, cites a customer or contract requirement, and reports controls are partially implemented — a well-scoped, high-value lead the intake surfaces quickly.

Failed a prior audit

The client selects 'Failed a previous audit or assessment' as their stage, the highest-weighted stage answer, signaling urgent remediation work rather than a routine planning conversation.

Unsure which framework applies

A prospect picks 'Not sure which one applies' and reports no documented policies — the intake still routes them, but flags that the scoping call needs to start with framework selection, not implementation.

Proactive NIST alignment

No audit deadline or incident is driving the request; the client cites proactive improvement and names NIST as the target framework, the signal marked urgent in scoring despite the absence of an external deadline.

Inquiry without approval authority

Someone fills out the intake but answers no to being authorized to approve security policy changes, a lower-weighted answer that tells the rep to loop in the actual decision-maker before booking anything.

Connect Cliont to your workflow

Send leads

HubSpot, HighLevel, Salesforce, JobNimbus

Book projects

Google Calendar, Outlook Calendar, Calendly

Notify your team

Email, SMS, Slack

Automate follow-up

Zapier, Webhooks, API

Simple, transparent pricing

Choose the plan that works for your business.

Most popular

Professional

Unlimited intake forms and leads for your growing business.

$397 / month
14-day free trial · Cancel anytime
  • Unlimited intake forms
  • Custom video greetings
  • AI-powered voice bot
  • English + Spanish support
  • Automatic lead scoring
  • Digital estimates & e-signatures
  • Photo, video & file upload
  • Advanced analytics dashboard
Try free for 14 days

Pay Per Lead

Only pay when you receive a qualified lead.

$47 / qualified lead
No setup fees · No monthly fees
  • Unlimited intake forms
  • Custom video greetings
  • AI-powered voice bot
  • English + Spanish support
  • Automatic lead scoring
  • Digital estimates & e-signatures
  • Photo, video & file upload
  • Charged only for submitted leads
Get started

Compliance Security Program lead-intake FAQs

How does the intake tell us if a lead is ready to talk SOC 2 versus still deciding?

The framework question separates named frameworks like SOC 2, HIPAA, PCI DSS, and ISO 27001, all weighted as high-value answers, from 'Not sure which one applies,' which scores lower and flags a lead who needs framework guidance before deeper scoping.

What happens if the person submitting the form can't approve policy changes?

That question carries its own weighting — a 'no' answer scores well below a 'yes,' so those leads still land in your CRM but flagged as needing an actual approver looped in before the scoping call goes further.

Can the intake flag a client who failed a previous audit?

Yes. 'Failed a previous audit or assessment' is the highest-weighted stage option in the catalog, so those leads surface as more urgent than someone still in early planning.

Does this intake cover privacy law work like GDPR, or only security frameworks like SOC 2?

The framework question includes GDPR/CCPA privacy law and NIST framework alongside SOC 2, HIPAA, PCI DSS, and ISO 27001, so privacy-driven compliance requests are captured the same way as security-framework requests.

How is this different from the penetration testing or vulnerability assessment intake?

This intake is built around framework, compliance stage, and existing policy documentation rather than a technical testing scope, which is what the penetration testing and vulnerability assessment intakes ask about instead.

What should clients upload before the scoping call?

The intake requests any existing security policy documents, a prior audit or assessment report, and a scope diagram of the systems the framework needs to cover, so the call starts with real artifacts instead of pure discovery.

Turn compliance security program visitors into qualified clients

Give every compliance security program visitor a guided intake instead of a dead contact form — and get a scored, qualified lead before you take the first call.