By the Cliont product team
Supreme Court petition lead intake software for appellate attorneys

Supreme Court petition intake that captures your filing deadline up

The intake confirms whether the prospective client already has a final lower court judgment, whether their certiorari or petition-for-review deadline is still open, and whether the case raises a genuine constitutional or circuit-split issue — then collects the decision and key filings before the lead reaches your CRM.

Video greetingGuided intakeDocument uploadInstant lead scoring
Live previewQuestion 1 of 6
Are you trying to ask the U.S. Supreme Court or a state supreme court to review a lower court decision?
Yes
No

The exact intake your supreme court petitions leads complete

This is the real 6-question guided intake for Supreme Court Petitions — the same flow your customers finish before you ever pick up the phone.

Preview
Your video greeting plays here

What a qualified supreme court petitions lead should tell you

A petition asking the U.S. Supreme Court or a state supreme court to review a final decision from a lower court, typically turning on whether a hard filing deadline has run and whether the case raises a genuine legal issue rather than simple disagreement with the result.

  • Trying Ask U.S. Supreme
  • Already Have Final Written
  • Time File Petition Review
  • Decision Want Challenge Issued
  • Case Involve Important Legal
  • Have Copies Key Court

The questions your team needs answered

Every supreme court petitions intake asks these — and why each one matters.

QuestionWhy it matters
Are you trying to ask the U.S. Supreme Court or a state supreme court to review a lower court decision?Confirms the lead is actually pursuing supreme court review rather than a different appellate remedy, which is the core fit test for this practice area.
Do you already have a final written decision (judgment or order) from a lower court that you want to challenge?A petition can't proceed without a final written judgment, so this separates people ready to file from those still in active litigation below.
Has your time to file a petition for review or certiorari NOT expired yet?Filing deadlines for petitions are strict and largely non-extendable, so a lapsed deadline usually means the matter can't be taken regardless of merits.
Was the decision you want to challenge issued by the highest court available in your case (for example, a state supreme court or a U.S. court of appeals)?Petitions typically require that remedies at the highest available court have been exhausted, so a 'no' here flags leads that are premature.
Does your case involve an important legal issue (not just disagreement with the outcome), such as a constitutional question or conflicting rulings between courts?Supreme courts grant review for significant legal issues, not because a party disagrees with the result, so this question filters out leads that don't fit the standard for review.
Do you have copies of the key court documents (the decision, prior opinions, and major filings) or can you get them quickly?Petition drafting depends on the full record and prior opinions, so document availability signals how quickly the matter could actually move.

How Cliont scores supreme court petitions leads

Every answer is weighted automatically — no manual review required.

Value signals

  • Trying Ask U.S. Supreme: yes
  • Already Have Final Written: yes
  • Time File Petition Review: yes
  • Decision Want Challenge Issued: yes
  • Case Involve Important Legal: yes
  • Have Copies Key Court: yes

See the lead your team receives

Supreme Court Petition Lead

91/100
High Priority
Court seeking reviewU.S. Supreme Court (certiorari)
Lower court decisionFinal judgment from state supreme court
Filing deadlineNot yet expired
Highest court reachedYes, state supreme court
Legal issue raisedCircuit split on a constitutional question
Key documentsJudgment and prior opinions available now
Delivered to: Email · CRM

From first click to qualified lead

Follow people and businesses seeking counsel through one smooth, guided flow.

They land & meet you

Your video greeting plays instantly — a real face instead of a blank form.

They explain the matter

Smart questions adapt to their matter and capture the full scope.

They share the documents

The facts, dates, and any paperwork come attached, so you can assess the matter before the consultation.

You get a ready lead

Scored and qualified — waiting for you to win it.

Built for supreme court petitions workflows

Cliont capabilitySupreme Court Petitions application
Weighted lead scoringWeights an unexpired filing deadline and a genuine constitutional or circuit-split issue far more heavily than plain disagreement with the outcome, so petitions with real cert potential rise above the rest.
Conditional document requestsPrompts the prospective client to upload the lower court's final judgment and key prior filings before the file ever lands in your CRM.
Deadline flaggingFlags leads who answer that their time to file may have already expired, so you can decline or redirect them instead of scheduling a consultation on a petition you can't file.
CRM routingRoutes only petitions with a final judgment, an open filing window, and a significant legal issue into your CRM as qualified matters, leaving the rest visible but unscheduled.

Common supreme court petitions lead scenarios

Cert-ready with open deadline

Final judgment from a state supreme court, filing window still open, and a clear circuit split — the intake flags this as a strong candidate before any consultation is booked.

Deadline may have already run

The prospective client isn't sure if their time to petition has expired; the intake still asks the question directly so you can decline early instead of scoping a case you can't file.

Wrong court level, too soon

The decision came from a trial court rather than the highest court available, meaning remedies haven't been exhausted yet — the intake surfaces this instead of routing it as review-ready.

Unhappy with outcome, no real issue

The client has a final judgment and time to file, but the intake's issue-significance question reveals disagreement with the result rather than a constitutional or conflicting-rulings problem.

Connect Cliont to your workflow

Send leads

HubSpot, HighLevel, Salesforce, JobNimbus

Book matters

Google Calendar, Outlook Calendar, Calendly

Notify your team

Email, SMS, Slack

Automate follow-up

Zapier, Webhooks, API

Simple, transparent pricing

Choose the plan that works for your business.

Most popular

Professional

Unlimited intake forms and leads for your growing business.

$397 / month
14-day free trial · Cancel anytime
  • Unlimited intake forms
  • Custom video greetings
  • AI-powered voice bot
  • English + Spanish support
  • Automatic lead scoring
  • Digital estimates & e-signatures
  • Photo, video & file upload
  • Advanced analytics dashboard
Try free for 14 days

Pay Per Lead

Only pay when you receive a qualified lead.

$47 / qualified lead
No setup fees · No monthly fees
  • Unlimited intake forms
  • Custom video greetings
  • AI-powered voice bot
  • English + Spanish support
  • Automatic lead scoring
  • Digital estimates & e-signatures
  • Photo, video & file upload
  • Charged only for submitted leads
Get started

Supreme Court Petitions lead-intake FAQs

How does the intake tell a cert-worthy issue apart from someone who just lost and is upset?

One question specifically asks whether the case involves an important legal issue, such as a constitutional question or conflicting rulings between courts, rather than plain disagreement with the outcome. Leads that answer no on that point score lower even if every other answer looks strong.

What happens if a lead's filing deadline has already passed?

The intake asks directly whether the time to petition has not yet expired. A 'no' answer carries a low weight, so those leads are still captured and visible in your CRM but scored well below leads with an open filing window.

Does the intake check whether the decision even came from the right court?

Yes. One question confirms whether the ruling being challenged came from the highest court available in that case, such as a state supreme court or federal court of appeals, which helps flag leads that haven't exhausted lower appellate remedies yet.

Will the intake collect the underlying case documents before I ever talk to the person?

It asks whether the prospective client has, or can quickly get, copies of the lower court decision, prior opinions, and major filings, and the required uploads request those documents directly so you're not starting the review from scratch.

How is this different from the intake for Civil Appeals or Writs and Extraordinary Relief?

This intake is built around the specific mechanics of petitioning a supreme court for review, including whether a final judgment exists and whether the highest available court has already ruled, rather than the trial-record or emergency-relief questions used on the Civil Appeals or Writs and Extraordinary Relief pages.

Can the intake confirm there's actually a final decision to challenge?

Yes, one question asks whether the prospective client already has a final written judgment or order from the lower court, which separates people ready to petition from those still mid-litigation.

Turn supreme court petitions visitors into qualified cases

Give every supreme court petitions visitor a guided intake instead of a dead contact form — and get a scored, qualified lead before you book a consultation.