Catch the 14-day deadline before you clear your calendar
Ask whether the harm is irreparable, whether a 14-day deadline is looming, and whether the trial court already had a chance to fix the problem — then collect the written order or transcript before you agree to a consultation.
The exact intake your writs and extraordinary relief leads complete
This is the real 7-question guided intake for Writs and Extraordinary Relief — the same flow your customers finish before you ever pick up the phone.
What a qualified writs and extraordinary relief lead should tell you
A request asking a higher court to intervene in a case before it is final — for example a writ of mandamus, prohibition, or an emergency stay — typically because waiting for a normal appeal would cause harm that cannot later be undone.
- Case In U.S. Court
- Trying Challenge Judge’S Order
- There Urgent Deadline (
- Waiting Until Normal Appeal
- Have Written Order (Or
- Already Asked Trial Court
- Seeking Higher Court Order
The questions your team needs answered
Every writs and extraordinary relief intake asks these — and why each one matters.
| Question | Why it matters |
|---|---|
| Is your case in a U.S. court (state or federal)? | Writs and extraordinary relief only apply within the U.S. state or federal court system, so a no here signals the matter is likely outside your jurisdiction entirely. |
| Are you trying to challenge a judge’s order or decision in an ongoing case (before the case is finished)? | A yes confirms the case is still ongoing, which is what separates a writ from an ordinary post-judgment appeal handled under a different sibling service. |
| Is there an urgent deadline (for example, within the next 14 days) to ask a higher court to step in? | A near-term deadline is often the single biggest driver of whether a higher court will even consider stepping in before the case is over. |
| Would waiting until a normal appeal after the case ends cause serious harm that can’t be fixed later (like losing custody time, being forced to disclose private information, or being jailed)? | Extraordinary relief exists specifically for harm that can't be undone later, so this answer is the core test of whether the request belongs in this category at all. |
| Do you have the written order (or a transcript/minute entry) showing what the judge decided? | Reviewing the actual written order or transcript, rather than a client's summary, is usually necessary before you can assess whether a writ is even viable. |
| Have you already asked the trial court to fix the problem (for example, by filing a motion to reconsider, to stay the order, or for emergency relief), or do you have a clear reason you could not? | Most writ courts expect the trial court to have had a chance to correct the problem first, so this answer reveals a procedural gap that could affect whether relief is available. |
| Are you seeking a higher court order to stop something from happening or to require the judge to do something specific (instead of asking for money damages)? | Extraordinary relief typically seeks an order to stop or compel action rather than damages, so this confirms the request is the right procedural vehicle. |
How Cliont scores writs and extraordinary relief leads
Every answer is weighted automatically — no manual review required.
Value signals
- Case In U.S. Court: yes
- Trying Challenge Judge’S Order: yes
- There Urgent Deadline (: yes
- Waiting Until Normal Appeal: yes
- Have Written Order (Or: yes
- Already Asked Trial Court: yes
Urgency signals
- There Urgent Deadline (
- Already Asked Trial Court
See the lead your team receives
Writ of Mandamus – Emergency Stay Request
From first click to qualified lead
Follow people and businesses seeking counsel through one smooth, guided flow.
They land & meet you
Your video greeting plays instantly — a real face instead of a blank form.
They explain the matter
Smart questions adapt to their matter and capture the full scope.
They share the documents
The facts, dates, and any paperwork come attached, so you can assess the matter before the consultation.
You get a ready lead
Scored and qualified — waiting for you to win it.
Built for writs and extraordinary relief workflows
| Cliont capability | Writs And Extraordinary Relief application |
|---|---|
| Weighted scoring engine | A yes on the 14-day deadline question combined with a yes on irreparable harm pushes the lead into the high-priority band automatically, ahead of matters with no time pressure. |
| Document upload capture | The intake requests the written order or transcript before a consultation is offered, so you're not agreeing to meet based on a client's paraphrase of what the judge said. |
| CRM routing rules | Only leads that clear the ongoing-case and U.S.-court questions get pushed to your CRM as writ matters, keeping finished-case appeals out of the same queue. |
| Conditional intake logic | Whether the client already sought relief from the trial court is asked as its own step, so you can see procedural readiness before deciding whether the matter is postured for extraordinary relief. |
| Video intake widget | Lets the client describe the harm in their own words — useful when the irreparable-harm answer involves a nuanced situation like disclosure of private information that's hard to capture in a single checkbox. |
Common writs and extraordinary relief lead scenarios
Emergency stay request
Enforcement is set to happen within days and the client has the written order in hand, so the intake flags an urgent deadline and irreparable harm together for same-day review.
Mid-case disclosure order
The client wants to stop a private information order before the case ends, with real harm but no fixed deadline — the intake still routes it as high value even without urgency.
No trial court motion filed
The client never asked the trial court to reconsider or stay the order and has no explanation why, which the intake surfaces as a procedural gap worth clarifying before booking time.
Verbal ruling, no paperwork
The client describes a judge's ruling from the bench but has no written order, minute entry, or transcript yet, so the intake flags missing documentation rather than scoring it as ready.
Case already concluded
The trial court has entered final judgment, meaning an ordinary appeal — not a writ — is the correct path; the intake surfaces this mismatch instead of scoring it as an extraordinary relief matter.
Connect Cliont to your workflow
Send leads
HubSpot, HighLevel, Salesforce, JobNimbus
Book matters
Google Calendar, Outlook Calendar, Calendly
Notify your team
Email, SMS, Slack
Automate follow-up
Zapier, Webhooks, API
Simple, transparent pricing
Choose the plan that works for your business.
Professional
Unlimited intake forms and leads for your growing business.
- Unlimited intake forms
- Custom video greetings
- AI-powered voice bot
- English + Spanish support
- Automatic lead scoring
- Digital estimates & e-signatures
- Photo, video & file upload
- Advanced analytics dashboard
Pay Per Lead
Only pay when you receive a qualified lead.
- Unlimited intake forms
- Custom video greetings
- AI-powered voice bot
- English + Spanish support
- Automatic lead scoring
- Digital estimates & e-signatures
- Photo, video & file upload
- Charged only for submitted leads
More appellate practice intake templates
Writs and Extraordinary Relief lead-intake FAQs
How does the intake tell a real emergency from a routine appeal?
It asks directly whether a higher court needs to act within roughly 14 days and whether waiting for a normal appeal would cause harm that can't be fixed later, such as lost custody time or forced disclosure — both carry heavy weight in the score.
What happens if the client hasn't asked the trial court to fix the problem first?
The intake asks whether the client already filed a motion to reconsider, stay, or emergency relief, or has a clear reason they couldn't — a missing answer here lowers the score since most writ courts expect that step first.
Does this intake separate writs from an ordinary appeal?
Yes — it checks whether the client is challenging an order in an ongoing case rather than a final judgment, so matters that actually belong in Civil Appeals or Criminal Appeals surface differently instead of being scored as urgent relief.
What documents does the intake collect before a consultation?
It asks whether the client has the written order, transcript, or minute entry showing what the judge decided, so you can review the actual ruling instead of a secondhand description before deciding to meet.
Can this intake handle both civil and criminal writ requests?
It confirms the case is in a U.S. state or federal court and whether the relief sought is an order to stop or compel action rather than money damages, which applies across civil and criminal writ matters alike.
How is a custody or jail-related harm scored differently?
The irreparable-harm question specifically calls out losing custody time or being jailed as examples, and a yes answer carries the highest weight in the catalog alongside the 14-day deadline question.
Turn writs and extraordinary relief visitors into qualified cases
Give every writs and extraordinary relief visitor a guided intake instead of a dead contact form — and get a scored, qualified lead before you book a consultation.