Fraud intake that captures reliance and financial loss up front
Ask whether the matter involves a false statement the prospect relied on and whether it caused financial loss, then collect supporting emails, contracts, or pitch decks before the file ever reaches your CRM.
The exact intake your fraud and misrepresentation leads complete
This is the real 8-question guided intake for Fraud and Misrepresentation — the same flow your customers finish before you ever pick up the phone.
What a qualified fraud and misrepresentation lead should tell you
Claims that a business deal, investment, contract, or sale of a business involved a false or misleading statement the prospective client relied on to their financial detriment, as distinct from a personal consumer purchase dispute.
- This About Business Deal,
- Someone Make Statement Or
- Rely On That Statement
- Or Business Lose Money
- Know Who Made Statement
- This Happen Within Last
- Have Any Documents Or
- Legal Help Recover Money
The questions your team needs answered
Every fraud and misrepresentation intake asks these — and why each one matters.
| Question | Why it matters |
|---|---|
| Is this about a business deal, investment, contract, or sale of a business (not a personal/consumer purchase)? | Confirms the matter is a business deal rather than a personal consumer purchase, which is what keeps it inside the scope of a business-and-corporate-law practice. |
| Did someone make a statement or promise about an important fact that you believe was false or misleading? | A false or misleading statement about a material fact is the core element the whole claim depends on. |
| Did you rely on that statement or promise when you decided to move forward (for example, you paid money, signed, or invested)? | Reliance on the statement when paying, signing, or investing is a required element, so a no answer here weakens the claim regardless of the other facts. |
| Did you or your business lose money or property because of it (or are you facing a clear financial loss now)? | A quantifiable financial loss drives both the potential case value and how urgently the prospect needs help. |
| Do you know who made the statement (a person or company) and have a way to identify or contact them? | Being able to identify and contact who made the statement determines whether the claim can realistically be pursued against someone. |
| Did this happen within the last 4 years (or did you discover the problem within the last 2 years)? | Checking the timeline surfaces matters that may already be outside the limitations window before a consultation is booked. |
| Do you have any documents or messages that support what was said (emails, texts, contracts, pitch deck, invoices, recordings)? | Existing documents or messages show how much evidentiary support already exists rather than the attorney starting from a blank file. |
| Are you looking for legal help to recover money or unwind the deal, rather than only reporting it to the police or a regulator? | Distinguishes prospects seeking money recovery or to unwind a deal from those only wanting to report the conduct, which affects fit for a billable engagement. |
How Cliont scores fraud and misrepresentation leads
Every answer is weighted automatically — no manual review required.
Value signals
- This About Business Deal,: yes
- Someone Make Statement Or: yes
- Rely On That Statement: yes
- Or Business Lose Money: yes
- Know Who Made Statement: yes
- This Happen Within Last: yes
See the lead your team receives
Fraud and Misrepresentation Lead
From first click to qualified lead
Follow people and businesses seeking counsel through one smooth, guided flow.
They land & meet you
Your video greeting plays instantly — a real face instead of a blank form.
They explain the matter
Smart questions adapt to their matter and capture the full scope.
They share the documents
The facts, dates, and any paperwork come attached, so you can assess the matter before the consultation.
You get a ready lead
Scored and qualified — waiting for you to win it.
Built for fraud and misrepresentation workflows
| Cliont capability | Fraud And Misrepresentation application |
|---|---|
| Weighted scoring | Loads the most weight onto whether it's a business deal, whether a false statement was made, whether the prospect relied on it, and whether they lost money, so a pitch-deck investment loss outranks a vague complaint. |
| Document upload | Collects emails, contracts, pitch decks, or invoices tied to the alleged misstatement so you can gauge evidentiary strength before the first call. |
| Conditional flagging | Flags matters where the prospect can't identify or contact the person who made the statement, since that materially affects whether a claim is practical to pursue. |
| CRM routing | Sends only matters with confirmed reliance and a quantifiable loss into your CRM as active opportunities, holding back thinner inquiries. |
| Timeline check | Surfaces matters where the underlying conduct is outside the four-year window (or discovery is outside two years) for attorney review before scheduling. |
Common fraud and misrepresentation lead scenarios
Investor relied on pitch deck
A prospect invested after a founder made specific claims about revenue or traction, then discovered the numbers were false and lost money — every high-value signal in the catalog lines up.
Consumer purchase, not a deal
The dispute is over a personal purchase rather than a business deal, investment, or contract, so the intake flags it as outside scope for a business-and-corporate-law practice before it takes up consultation time.
Deal is outside the time window
The alleged misrepresentation happened more than four years ago and wasn't discovered recently, which the intake surfaces for review even when every other answer looks strong.
Can't identify the other party
The prospect suffered a real loss but doesn't know who made the statement or how to contact them, which lowers the intake's confidence that the claim can practically be pursued.
Wants a police report, not recovery
The prospect is mainly interested in reporting the conduct to police or a regulator rather than recovering money or unwinding the deal, signaling a weaker fit for billable civil representation.
Connect Cliont to your workflow
Send leads
HubSpot, HighLevel, Salesforce, JobNimbus
Book matters
Google Calendar, Outlook Calendar, Calendly
Notify your team
Email, SMS, Slack
Automate follow-up
Zapier, Webhooks, API
Simple, transparent pricing
Choose the plan that works for your business.
Professional
Unlimited intake forms and leads for your growing business.
- Unlimited intake forms
- Custom video greetings
- AI-powered voice bot
- English + Spanish support
- Automatic lead scoring
- Digital estimates & e-signatures
- Photo, video & file upload
- Advanced analytics dashboard
Pay Per Lead
Only pay when you receive a qualified lead.
- Unlimited intake forms
- Custom video greetings
- AI-powered voice bot
- English + Spanish support
- Automatic lead scoring
- Digital estimates & e-signatures
- Photo, video & file upload
- Charged only for submitted leads
More business and corporate law intake templates
Fraud and Misrepresentation lead-intake FAQs
How does the intake keep personal consumer disputes from booking a consultation?
The first question asks whether the matter is a business deal, investment, contract, or sale of a business rather than a personal purchase, so consumer-only disputes score lower and can be routed away from your calendar.
What if a prospect can't point to a specific false statement?
The intake separately checks whether a false statement was made and whether the prospect actually relied on it when they paid, signed, or invested — if either answer is no, the score drops because a core element of the claim is missing.
Does the intake check for statute-of-limitations problems before I meet the client?
Yes — it asks whether the conduct happened within the last four years or was discovered within the last two, so older matters that may be time-barred are visible before you offer a consultation.
What happens if the prospect only wants to report the fraud, not recover money?
The intake asks directly whether they want legal help recovering money or unwinding the deal versus only reporting it to police or a regulator, which helps you spot matters that aren't a fit for a billable civil engagement.
What documents does the intake collect before the consultation?
It asks whether the prospect has emails, texts, contracts, a pitch deck, invoices, or recordings supporting the alleged statement, so you can see what evidence already exists rather than starting from zero.
Can this intake tell fraud claims apart from breach of fiduciary duty or business torts matters?
This intake is built specifically around the elements of a false statement, reliance, and resulting loss; if a prospect's issue is really about a partner's conduct or a business relationship breaking down, your Breach of Fiduciary Duty or Business Torts intake pages are the better fit.
Turn fraud and misrepresentation visitors into qualified cases
Give every fraud and misrepresentation visitor a guided intake instead of a dead contact form — and get a scored, qualified lead before you book a consultation.