By the Cliont product team
Right of publicity and privacy lead intake for entertainment, sports & media attorneys

Know which likeness-misuse leads are worth consultation time

Ask prospective clients whether the use was commercial, when it happened, and whether they can identify who used their likeness, then collect screenshots or a link to the use before the lead ever reaches your CRM.

●Video greeting●Guided intake●Document upload●Instant lead scoring
Live previewQuestion 1 of 7
Did someone use your name, photo, video, voice, likeness, or personal story without your permission?
Yes
No

Preview your right of publicity and privacy intake

Explore 7 questions from the Right of Publicity and Privacy template. This interactive preview uses illustrative scoring and sample attachments. Open the full survey to try the complete intake.

Preview
Your video greeting plays here

What a qualified right of publicity and privacy lead should tell you

Claims that a person's name, photo, video, voice, likeness, or private information was used without consent, evaluated on whether the use was commercial, who did it, where it reached, and whether it caused measurable harm.

  • Someone Use Name, Photo,
  • Use Connected Promoting Or
  • This Happen In United
  • Use Happen Within Last
  • Identify Who Used Identity
  • Lose Money, Miss Out
  • Use Something Other Than

The questions your team needs answered

Every right of publicity and privacy intake asks these — and why each one matters.

QuestionWhy it matters
Did someone use your name, photo, video, voice, likeness, or personal story without your permission?Confirming unauthorized use is the foundational element of any right of publicity or privacy claim.
Was the use connected to promoting or selling something (like an ad, product, service, app, event, or brand)?A commercial or promotional use typically supports stronger damages than a purely non-commercial one.
Did this happen in the United States, or was it aimed at a U.S. audience (for example, a U.S.-based company or U.S. customers)?U.S. jurisdiction determines which state's publicity and privacy law, and remedies, even apply.
Did the use happen within the last 2 years (or is it still happening now)?Recent or ongoing use signals the matter is more likely within a workable statute-of-limitations window.
Can you identify who used your identity or posted it (a company, brand, website, app account, or person)?Being able to name a defendant affects whether the claim can realistically be pursued and collected on.
Did you lose money, miss out on paid opportunities, or have your reputation or privacy harmed because of it?Documented financial or reputational harm points to provable damages worth pursuing.
Was the use something other than a news report, documentary, commentary, or other public-interest coverage?Ruling out news, documentary, or commentary use flags whether a public-interest or First Amendment defense is likely.

How Cliont scores right of publicity and privacy leads

Configured answer weights help your team prioritize follow-up. Your team reviews each submission and decides the next step.

Value signals

  • Someone Use Name, Photo,: yes
  • Use Connected Promoting Or: yes
  • This Happen In United: yes
  • Use Happen Within Last: yes
  • Identify Who Used Identity: yes
  • Lose Money, Miss Out: yes

See an example lead handoff

Illustrative lead details and score show how a submission can reach your team.

Right of Publicity Lead

88/100
High Priority
Used without permissionYes
Connected to promoting/selling somethingYes
U.S. or U.S.-audience useYes
Occurred within last 2 yearsYes
Can identify who used itYes, a named brand account
Lost money or reputational harmYes, lost a paid endorsement deal
Delivered to: Email · CRM · SMS notification

From first click to qualified lead

Follow people and businesses seeking counsel through one smooth, guided flow.

They land & meet you

Your video greeting plays instantly — a real face instead of a blank form.

They explain the matter

Smart questions adapt to their matter and capture the full scope.

They share the documents

The facts, dates, and any paperwork come attached, so you can assess the matter before the consultation.

You get a ready lead

Scored and qualified — waiting for you to win it.

Built for right of publicity and privacy workflows

Cliont capabilityRight Of Publicity And Privacy application
Conditional question branchingIf a lead confirms the use was news, documentary, or commentary rather than promotional, the intake can route that answer to flag a likely public-interest defense before you invest consultation time.
Weighted lead scoringCommercial use, U.S. reach, and identified defendants each carry independent weight, so a promotional ad campaign scores meaningfully higher than a private, unidentified, non-commercial incident.
Evidence upload widgetClients attach a screenshot or link to where their name, image, or likeness appeared, giving you the actual use to review instead of a secondhand description.
CRM lead routingQualified matters, with their commercial-use, jurisdiction, and identification answers attached, land directly in your CRM instead of a generic contact-form inbox.

Example right of publicity and privacy lead scenarios

Illustrative situations explain the intake questions and possible follow-up.

Ad campaign using unmoderated photo

A brand ran a photo or clip in a U.S. ad without consent, and the client can name the company and point to lost paid work. These answers push the score high and flag it as a commercial matter.

Old, no-longer-running use

The unauthorized use happened more than two years ago and isn't active now, with no clear financial harm. The intake still records it but scores it lower given the stale timeline.

Can't identify who posted it

A client's video is circulating but they don't know which account or company originally posted it. The intake captures this gap so you know upfront that a defendant may need to be identified before any claim is viable.

Coverage inside a news segment

The use appeared inside a documentary or news report rather than an ad or product. This answer flags a likely public-interest defense before you spend consultation time on it.

Use aimed at a non-U.S. audience

The unauthorized use ran on a platform or campaign targeting customers outside the U.S. This lowers priority since publicity and privacy rights and remedies vary sharply by jurisdiction.

Connect Cliont to your workflow

Connect your CRM

HubSpot, HighLevel, monday.com

Connect your legal software

Lawmatics, MyCase, Clio Manage and Clio Grow

Notify your team

Email, SMS, Slack

Configure other destinations

Google Sheets, configured webhooks, Zapier and API workflows

Simple, transparent pricing

Choose the plan that works for your business.

Most popular

Professional

Unlimited intake forms and leads for your growing business.

$397 / month
14-day free trial · Cancel anytime
  • Unlimited intake forms
  • Custom video greetings
  • AI-powered voice bot
  • English + Spanish support
  • Automatic lead scoring
  • Digital estimates & e-signatures
  • Photo, video & file upload
  • Advanced analytics dashboard
Try free for 14 days

Pay Per Lead

Only pay when you receive a qualified lead.

$47 / qualified lead
No setup fees · No monthly fees
  • Unlimited intake forms
  • Custom video greetings
  • AI-powered voice bot
  • English + Spanish support
  • Automatic lead scoring
  • Digital estimates & e-signatures
  • Photo, video & file upload
  • Charged only for submitted leads
Get started

Right of Publicity and Privacy lead-intake FAQs

What happens if the client doesn't know who used their image?

The intake still asks the identification question directly, so you see upfront whether the client can name a company, account, or person, versus needing investigation before a claim can move forward.

Does the intake screen out news or documentary uses?

Yes, it asks whether the use was something other than news reporting, documentary, or commentary, which surfaces likely public-interest defenses before you take the call.

How does the intake treat commercial versus non-commercial use?

It asks directly whether the use was tied to promoting or selling something, since commercial misappropriation claims and available damages differ from purely private, non-commercial exposure.

Why does the intake ask if the use happened in or targeted the U.S.?

Right of publicity and privacy protections vary by state and don't apply the same way to uses with no U.S. connection, so this answer helps you triage jurisdiction before scheduling a consultation.

Why does timing matter in the intake?

The intake asks whether the use happened within the last two years or is ongoing, which flags matters that may be closer to statute-of-limitations concerns for your review.

What evidence does the intake collect before the lead reaches me?

It's built to gather a link or screenshot of the unauthorized use alongside the qualifying answers, so you can review actual evidence rather than a client's verbal description alone.

Turn right of publicity and privacy visitors into qualified cases

Give every right of publicity and privacy visitor a guided intake instead of a dead contact form — and get a scored, qualified lead before you book a consultation.