AEP Power Company intake that captures exposure dates and diagnosis up front
Ask every AEP Power Company prospect about exposure location, exposure dates, and any diagnosis tied to the contaminant before you spend consultation time on a claim outside the class area. Collect residency records and supporting documentation directly in the intake so only claims with real exposure evidence land in your CRM.
Preview your aep power company class action intake
Explore 7 questions from the AEP Power Company Class Action template. This interactive preview uses illustrative scoring and sample attachments. Open the full survey to try the complete intake.
What a qualified aep power company class action lead should tell you
Screens prospective claimants for alleged exposure to emissions, ash, or contaminated water tied to a named AEP Power Company facility, based on location, timing, supporting records, and any resulting diagnosis or documented loss.
- Exposed Emissions, Ash, Or
- Exposure Occur Within Area
- Have Records Showing Were
- After Exposure, Did Receive
- Have Documented Cleanup Costs,
- Live, Work, Or Own
- Report Dust, Ash, Smoke,
The questions your team needs answered
Every aep power company class action intake asks these — and why each one matters.
| Question | Why it matters |
|---|---|
| Were you exposed to emissions, ash, or contaminated water linked to an AEP Power Company facility during the claimed period? | This is the foundational exposure question — a no answer here undermines the entire claim regardless of location or documentation. |
| Did your exposure occur within the area identified for this AEP Power Company action? | Confirms the prospect's exposure falls within the geographic scope actually defined for this specific action, not just near any AEP facility. |
| Do you have records showing you were at the exposure location during the relevant dates? | Records placing the person at the location during the relevant dates are often the deciding factor in whether a claim can be substantiated at all. |
| After the exposure, did you receive a diagnosis or test result tied to the same contaminant source? | A diagnosis or test result tied to the same contaminant source establishes the causal link personal injury claims depend on. |
| Did you have documented cleanup costs, repair expenses, medical bills, or property value loss related to the exposure? | Documented cleanup, repair, medical, or property-value costs capture economic harm even when there's no personal health diagnosis. |
| Did you live, work, or own property near an AEP Power Company facility named in this action during the claimed period? | Living, working, or owning property near the named facility establishes an exposure pathway independent of the strict action-area boundary. |
| Did you report dust, ash, smoke, or water contamination from the AEP facility to a doctor, government agency, or landlord at the time? | A contemporaneous complaint to a doctor, agency, or landlord supports the exposure timeline and can weaken later statute-of-limitations disputes. |
How Cliont scores aep power company class action leads
Configured answer weights help your team prioritize follow-up. Your team reviews each submission and decides the next step.
Value signals
- Exposed Emissions, Ash, Or: yes
- Exposure Occur Within Area: yes
- Have Records Showing Were: yes
- After Exposure, Did Receive: yes
- Have Documented Cleanup Costs,: yes
- Live, Work, Or Own: yes
Urgency signals
- Exposed Emissions, Ash, Or
- Report Dust, Ash, Smoke,
See an example lead handoff
Illustrative lead details and score show how a submission can reach your team.
AEP Power Company Class Action Lead
From first click to qualified lead
Follow people and businesses seeking counsel through one smooth, guided flow.
They land & meet you
Your video greeting plays instantly — a real face instead of a blank form.
They explain the matter
Smart questions adapt to their matter and capture the full scope.
They share the documents
The facts, dates, and any paperwork come attached, so you can assess the matter before the consultation.
You get a ready lead
Scored and qualified — waiting for you to win it.
Built for aep power company class action workflows
| Cliont capability | AEP Power Company Class Action application |
|---|---|
| Weighted scoring engine | Applies the AEP catalog's weights — exposure confirmation, area match, location records, diagnosis, and documented costs — so a claim with strong evidence outranks a vague inquiry automatically. |
| Conditional question branching | If a prospect answers no to exposure to AEP emissions, ash, or water, the intake can skip deeper follow-ups on diagnosis and costs rather than wasting their time on irrelevant questions. |
| Document upload capture | Collects residency records, medical documentation, and cost receipts directly against the exposure-location and diagnosis questions so evidence arrives with the claim, not after a call. |
| Lead scoring bands | Separates claims with confirmed area exposure and diagnosis from claims with exposure but no supporting records, so your team can triage consultation slots instead of reviewing every submission cold. |
Example aep power company class action lead scenarios
Illustrative situations explain the intake questions and possible follow-up.
Nearby resident with confirmed diagnosis
Lived near the named AEP facility during the claimed period, has records placing them at the location, and received a diagnosis tied to the contaminant — the intake flags this as a high-value match.
Property owner without a diagnosis
Owns property near the facility with documented cleanup costs or value loss but no personal health diagnosis — the intake still scores the claim on property harm rather than treating it as a non-match.
Exposure claim outside the named area
Answers yes to exposure but no to being within the identified action area — the intake captures this geographic mismatch so it can be flagged for review instead of booked automatically.
Contemporaneous complaint on file
Reported dust, ash, or water contamination to a doctor, agency, or landlord at the time — this timing detail helps flag claims with documentation supporting an earlier exposure date.
No supporting records available
Believes they were exposed but has no records placing them at the location and no diagnosis — the intake still captures the claim but scores it lower so the firm can decide whether to pursue it manually.
Connect Cliont to your workflow
Connect your CRM
HubSpot, HighLevel, monday.com
Connect your legal software
Lawmatics, MyCase, Clio Manage and Clio Grow
Notify your team
Email, SMS, Slack
Configure other destinations
Google Sheets, configured webhooks, Zapier and API workflows
Simple, transparent pricing
Choose the plan that works for your business.
Professional
Unlimited intake forms and leads for your growing business.
- Unlimited intake forms
- Custom video greetings
- AI-powered voice bot
- English + Spanish support
- Automatic lead scoring
- Digital estimates & e-signatures
- Photo, video & file upload
- Advanced analytics dashboard
Pay Per Lead
Only pay when you receive a qualified lead.
- Unlimited intake forms
- Custom video greetings
- AI-powered voice bot
- English + Spanish support
- Automatic lead scoring
- Digital estimates & e-signatures
- Photo, video & file upload
- Charged only for submitted leads
More mass torts intake templates
AEP Power Company Class Action lead-intake FAQs
How does the intake confirm a prospect was in the right exposure area?
The intake asks separately whether the exposure occurred within the identified action area and whether the person lived, worked, or owned property near the named facility, so a firm can see geographic fit even when the two answers don't line up exactly.
What happens if a prospect has no records placing them at the location?
The claim is still captured and delivered, but the missing-records answer lowers the score relative to a claim backed by documents like leases or utility bills, so your team can prioritize accordingly.
Does a lead need a medical diagnosis to qualify?
No — the intake also asks about documented cleanup costs, repair expenses, or property value loss, so property-damage-only claims are scored on their own merits rather than being treated as incomplete.
Can this intake handle both personal injury and property damage AEP claims?
Yes, the same catalog asks about diagnosis tied to the contaminant and separately about cleanup costs or property loss, so both claim types are captured and scored within one intake flow.
What documents should prospects be asked to submit?
Residency or ownership records, medical or diagnostic records tied to the contaminant, and receipts or estimates for cleanup or repair costs give your intake evidentiary support beyond the self-reported answers.
Why does the intake ask whether the exposure was reported at the time?
A contemporaneous report to a doctor, agency, or landlord helps establish the exposure timeline, which is one of the urgency signals the intake uses to flag claims worth faster follow-up.
Turn aep power company class action visitors into qualified cases
Give every aep power company class action visitor a guided intake instead of a dead contact form — and get a scored, qualified lead before you book a consultation.