Which JUUL leads show a diagnosed health problem
The intake asks whether the prospective client used JUUL pods, developed a health problem after vaping, and had that condition diagnosed or treated by a medical professional, then collects medical records and proof of use before the lead reaches your CRM.
The exact intake your juul and vaping injuries leads complete
This is the real 7-question guided intake for JUUL and Vaping Injuries — the same flow your customers finish before you ever pick up the phone.
What a qualified juul and vaping injuries lead should tell you
This intake screens prospective JUUL and vaping injury claims by capturing device use, health outcomes, diagnosis details, and use history needed to evaluate a mass tort claim.
- Use Juul Device Or
- Develop Health Problem After
- Medical Professional Diagnose Or
- Use Juul Regularly At
- Become Addicted Nicotine After
- Under 18 When First
- Start Using Juul Before
The questions your team needs answered
Every juul and vaping injuries intake asks these — and why each one matters.
| Question | Why it matters |
|---|---|
| Did you use a JUUL device or JUUL pods? | Confirms the claim is tied specifically to JUUL products rather than vaping devices outside the litigation, which affects eligibility. |
| Did you develop a health problem after using JUUL or vaping? | Establishes a health outcome connected to JUUL use, the core element of any vaping injury claim. |
| Did a medical professional diagnose or treat that health problem? | A professional diagnosis or treatment record turns a self-reported symptom into a documented medical claim your firm can substantiate. |
| Did you use JUUL regularly for at least three months? | Three or more months of regular use supports exposure duration arguments that strengthen causation in a mass tort filing. |
| Did you become addicted to nicotine after using JUUL? | Flags nicotine addiction claims, which can stand on their own even when no separate illness has been diagnosed. |
| Were you under 18 when you first used a JUUL device or JUUL pods? | Underage first use raises marketing-to-minors liability theories that are evaluated differently than adult-use claims. |
| Did you start using JUUL before seeing any nicotine addiction warnings on the packaging or in advertisements? | Use before warning labels appeared supports failure-to-warn arguments central to many JUUL mass tort claims. |
How Cliont scores juul and vaping injuries leads
Every answer is weighted automatically — no manual review required.
Value signals
- Use Juul Device Or: yes
- Develop Health Problem After: yes
- Medical Professional Diagnose Or: yes
- Use Juul Regularly At: yes
- Become Addicted Nicotine After: yes
- Under 18 When First: yes
See the lead your team receives
JUUL and Vaping Injury Lead
From first click to qualified lead
Follow people and businesses seeking counsel through one smooth, guided flow.
They land & meet you
Your video greeting plays instantly — a real face instead of a blank form.
They explain the matter
Smart questions adapt to their matter and capture the full scope.
They share the documents
The facts, dates, and any paperwork come attached, so you can assess the matter before the consultation.
You get a ready lead
Scored and qualified — waiting for you to win it.
Built for juul and vaping injuries workflows
| Cliont capability | JUUL And Vaping Injuries application |
|---|---|
| Weighted scoring logic | Weighs a medical diagnosis or treatment record above self-reported nicotine addiction, so leads with documented injury surface ahead of undiagnosed complaints. |
| Document upload capture | Collects medical records and proof of JUUL purchase or use directly in the intake, so your team has diagnosis evidence before the first call. |
| Conditional branching | Surfaces the under-18 first-use and pre-warning-label questions as distinct signals, letting you separate marketing-to-minors and failure-to-warn theories from standard adult-use claims. |
| CRM routing | Sends leads with a confirmed diagnosis and three-plus months of regular JUUL use into your CRM as priority claims, separate from addiction-only or no-symptom inquiries. |
Common juul and vaping injuries lead scenarios
Diagnosed vaping-related illness
Prospect used JUUL, developed a health problem, and has a medical diagnosis on record — the intake weights all three answers heavily and routes it as a strong claim.
Long-term use, addiction only
Prospect used JUUL regularly for months and became addicted to nicotine but has no diagnosed illness yet, so the intake scores the addiction signal without the higher-weighted diagnosis fields.
First use as a minor
Prospect was under 18 when they first used JUUL, which raises a marketing-to-minors angle the intake flags separately from adult-use claims.
Used before warning labels existed
Prospect started vaping before nicotine warnings appeared on packaging or ads, supporting a failure-to-warn theory the intake surfaces through that specific answer.
Casual vaper, no symptoms
Prospect used a device but reports no resulting health problem, so the intake scores this lower without discarding the inquiry outright.
Connect Cliont to your workflow
Send leads
HubSpot, HighLevel, Salesforce, JobNimbus
Book matters
Google Calendar, Outlook Calendar, Calendly
Notify your team
Email, SMS, Slack
Automate follow-up
Zapier, Webhooks, API
Simple, transparent pricing
Choose the plan that works for your business.
Professional
Unlimited intake forms and leads for your growing business.
- Unlimited intake forms
- Custom video greetings
- AI-powered voice bot
- English + Spanish support
- Automatic lead scoring
- Digital estimates & e-signatures
- Photo, video & file upload
- Advanced analytics dashboard
Pay Per Lead
Only pay when you receive a qualified lead.
- Unlimited intake forms
- Custom video greetings
- AI-powered voice bot
- English + Spanish support
- Automatic lead scoring
- Digital estimates & e-signatures
- Photo, video & file upload
- Charged only for submitted leads
More mass torts intake templates
JUUL and Vaping Injuries lead-intake FAQs
Does the intake distinguish JUUL-specific use from vaping in general?
Yes. The first question asks specifically about JUUL devices or JUUL pods, which matters because litigation eligibility is often tied to that brand rather than vaping products generally.
Can the intake qualify an addiction-only claim with no diagnosed illness?
Yes. Nicotine addiction is scored on its own weight even when the medical diagnosis question comes back no, so addiction-only leads still register as worth review rather than being filtered out.
How does underage first use affect the lead score?
A prospect who was under 18 at first use answers a dedicated question that the intake tracks separately, since marketing-to-minors claims are evaluated differently than adult-use claims.
Does the timing of warning labels matter to the intake?
Yes. The intake asks whether use began before nicotine addiction warnings appeared on packaging or advertising, which supports failure-to-warn arguments in many JUUL claims.
What documentation does the intake collect from prospects?
Alongside the qualification questions, the intake requests medical records showing diagnosis or treatment and proof of JUUL purchase or use before the lead is sent to your CRM.
Will a prospect with no health problem still get routed to my CRM?
Yes, but with a lower score. The intake doesn't discard leads that answer no on health problems and diagnosis; it simply weights them below leads with documented injury or addiction.
Turn juul and vaping injuries visitors into qualified cases
Give every juul and vaping injuries visitor a guided intake instead of a dead contact form — and get a scored, qualified lead before you book a consultation.