Article 32 intake that captures charge and hearing timing up front
Cliont's Article 32 intake asks whether charges have been preferred, when the hearing is scheduled, and whether the case falls under the UCMJ before the file lands in your CRM. Charge sheets and hearing notifications are collected upfront so you can see case posture before the first call.
Preview your article 32 hearings intake
Explore 6 questions from the Article 32 Hearings template. This interactive preview uses illustrative scoring and sample attachments. Open the full survey to try the complete intake.
What a qualified article 32 hearings lead should tell you
An Article 32 hearing is the UCMJ pretrial proceeding where a hearing officer reviews evidence and recommends whether a case should proceed to court-martial; the intake needs to confirm service status, whether charges have been preferred, and how soon the hearing is set to gauge how time-sensitive the matter is.
- Current Or Former U.S.
- Been Told Have (Or
- Case Being Handled Under
- Charges Been Preferred Against
- Article 32 Hearing Scheduled
- Want Speak With Military
The questions your team needs answered
Every article 32 hearings intake asks these — and why each one matters.
| Question | Why it matters |
|---|---|
| Are you a current or former U.S. service member (active duty, Reserve, or National Guard) involved in a military criminal case? | Whether the caller is the service member themselves versus a third party calling on their behalf changes both score and how you should frame the first call. |
| Have you been told you have (or may soon have) an Article 32 hearing related to your case? | A confirmed Article 32 notice separates people already in the pretrial process from those still researching military charges in general. |
| Is the case being handled under the UCMJ (military justice system) rather than a civilian court only? | Confirming the matter is proceeding under the UCMJ rather than civilian court only tells you it's actually within an Article 32 practice. |
| Have charges been preferred against you, or have you received paperwork saying charges may be filed? | Preferred charges or filing paperwork indicate the case has moved from investigation to formal proceedings, which raises urgency. |
| Is your Article 32 hearing scheduled within the next 60 days, or do you expect it to be scheduled soon? | A hearing date within 60 days signals a compressed prep timeline that should move the lead to the front of your queue. |
| Do you want to speak with a military defense lawyer about preparing for or responding to the Article 32 hearing? | This isolates people who actively want representation for the hearing from those who are only gathering information. |
How Cliont scores article 32 hearings leads
Configured answer weights help your team prioritize follow-up. Your team reviews each submission and decides the next step.
Value signals
- Current Or Former U.S.: yes
- Been Told Have (Or: yes
- Case Being Handled Under: yes
- Charges Been Preferred Against: yes
- Article 32 Hearing Scheduled: yes
- Want Speak With Military: yes
Urgency signals
- Current Or Former U.S.
See an example lead handoff
Illustrative lead details and score show how a submission can reach your team.
Article 32 Hearing Lead
From first click to qualified lead
Follow people and businesses seeking counsel through one smooth, guided flow.
They land & meet you
Your video greeting plays instantly — a real face instead of a blank form.
They explain the matter
Smart questions adapt to their matter and capture the full scope.
They share the documents
The facts, dates, and any paperwork come attached, so you can assess the matter before the consultation.
You get a ready lead
Scored and qualified — waiting for you to win it.
Built for article 32 hearings workflows
| Cliont capability | Article 32 Hearings application |
|---|---|
| Weighted scoring | Charges preferred and a hearing date within 60 days both carry heavy weight, so confirmed pretrial cases surface above general questions. |
| Document capture | Callers upload charge sheets or preferral paperwork and hearing notification memos directly in the intake, before you ever schedule a consultation. |
| Conditional scoring on caller identity | When the intake taker isn't the service member, the score adjusts down instead of disqualifying the lead outright, reflecting that family members often initiate contact. |
| CRM routing | Qualified Article 32 leads, along with their uploaded charge sheets and hearing timeline, are sent straight to your CRM instead of sitting in a shared inbox. |
Example article 32 hearings lead scenarios
Illustrative situations explain the intake questions and possible follow-up.
Charges preferred, hearing set fast
An active-duty caller confirms charges have already been preferred and the hearing is expected within 60 days, which pushes the score to the top of the queue.
Command inquiry, no charges yet
A service member has been told an Article 32 hearing may happen but no charges are preferred and no date is set, producing a real but less urgent lead.
Family member calling for the accused
A parent or spouse fills out the intake on behalf of the accused, so the service-member question comes back 'no' even though the underlying case is active, lowering the score without disqualifying it.
Reserve component case under UCMJ
A National Guard member confirms the case is proceeding under the UCMJ rather than civilian court, a distinction the intake flags separately from active-duty status.
Connect Cliont to your workflow
Connect your CRM
HubSpot, HighLevel, monday.com
Connect your legal software
Lawmatics, MyCase, Clio Manage and Clio Grow
Notify your team
Email, SMS, Slack
Configure other destinations
Google Sheets, configured webhooks, Zapier and API workflows
Simple, transparent pricing
Choose the plan that works for your business.
Professional
Unlimited intake forms and leads for your growing business.
- Unlimited intake forms
- Custom video greetings
- AI-powered voice bot
- English + Spanish support
- Automatic lead scoring
- Digital estimates & e-signatures
- Photo, video & file upload
- Advanced analytics dashboard
Pay Per Lead
Only pay when you receive a qualified lead.
- Unlimited intake forms
- Custom video greetings
- AI-powered voice bot
- English + Spanish support
- Automatic lead scoring
- Digital estimates & e-signatures
- Photo, video & file upload
- Charged only for submitted leads
More military law intake templates
Article 32 Hearings lead-intake FAQs
How does the intake separate real Article 32 cases from general military law questions?
The catalog asks directly whether the person has been told they have, or may soon have, an Article 32 hearing and whether charges have been preferred or may be filed, so vague inquiries score lower than confirmed pretrial matters.
What happens if the person filling out the form isn't the service member?
The service-member question is weighted heavily, so a 'no' answer still allows the lead through but at a reduced score, which is useful when a spouse or parent is calling on the accused's behalf.
Can the intake tell me how soon a hearing is coming up?
Yes, it asks whether the Article 32 hearing is scheduled within 60 days or expected to be scheduled soon, which is one of the signals used to flag time-sensitive files.
Does the intake confirm the case is actually going through the UCMJ and not just civilian court?
One catalog question asks specifically whether the case is being handled under the UCMJ rather than a civilian court only, which matters for scoping whether this is your kind of matter at all.
What documents does the intake ask for before I get on a call?
Callers are prompted to upload charge sheets or preferral paperwork and any hearing notification they've received, so you can see the case posture before the consultation.
Will the intake tell me if they actually want a lawyer for the hearing, or are they just gathering information?
Yes, one question asks directly whether they want to speak with a military defense lawyer about preparing for or responding to the Article 32 hearing, separating genuine retention interest from research-only inquiries.
Turn article 32 hearings visitors into qualified cases
Give every article 32 hearings visitor a guided intake instead of a dead contact form — and get a scored, qualified lead before you book a consultation.