By the Cliont product team
court-martial defense lead intake software for military law attorneys

Which court-martial cases deserve consultation time

Every enquiry confirms UCMJ status, checks whether charges or an Article 32 hearing are already in motion, and flags cases with a hearing or deadline inside 30 days — with charge sheets and command notices captured before the first call.

Video greetingGuided intakeDocument uploadInstant lead scoring
Live previewQuestion 1 of 7
Are you (or the person you’re helping) a current or former U.S. service member subject to the UCMJ?
Yes
No

The exact intake your court-martial defense leads complete

This is the real 7-question guided intake for Court-Martial Defense — the same flow your customers finish before you ever pick up the phone.

Preview
Your video greeting plays here

What a qualified court-martial defense lead should tell you

Defense representation for a service member facing charges under the UCMJ, spanning the point of command notification or CID/NCIS/OSI investigation through Article 32 hearings and a scheduled or completed court-martial.

  • (Or Person ’Re Helping)
  • This About Court-Martial Case
  • Been Notified Alleged Misconduct
  • Case In United States
  • Want Legal Help Defend
  • There Upcoming Deadline, Hearing,
  • Willing Speak With Private

The questions your team needs answered

Every court-martial defense intake asks these — and why each one matters.

QuestionWhy it matters
Are you (or the person you’re helping) a current or former U.S. service member subject to the UCMJ?Confirms UCMJ status first because non-service-members fall outside a military defense attorney's jurisdiction entirely.
Is this about a court-martial case (charges filed, an Article 32 hearing, or a court-martial scheduled or completed)?Distinguishes an active court-martial matter from a general inquiry, which changes how urgently the case needs attorney attention.
Have you been notified of alleged misconduct or charges by your command, CID/NCIS/OSI, or a military prosecutor?Captures whether command or investigators have already made contact, signaling the case has moved past a hypothetical concern.
Is the case in the United States or under U.S. military jurisdiction (including overseas bases)?Confirms the case sits within U.S. military jurisdiction, including overseas bases, before the attorney invests time on a matter outside their authority.
Do you want legal help to defend against the charges or to reduce possible punishment (such as confinement, discharge, or loss of rank/pay)?Separates leads seeking to fight the charges from those focused on minimizing punishment, which shapes the defense strategy discussed in a first call.
Is there an upcoming deadline, hearing, interrogation, or court date within the next 30 days?A hearing, interrogation, or court date inside 30 days means the case needs a response before a standard intake queue would normally reach it.
Are you willing to speak with a private military defense attorney (even if you also have a military-appointed lawyer)?Shows whether the person is open to retaining private counsel even with a JAG lawyer assigned, which affects whether a paid engagement is realistic.

How Cliont scores court-martial defense leads

Every answer is weighted automatically — no manual review required.

Value signals

  • (Or Person ’Re Helping): yes
  • This About Court-Martial Case: yes
  • Been Notified Alleged Misconduct: yes
  • Case In United States: yes
  • Want Legal Help Defend: yes
  • There Upcoming Deadline, Hearing,: yes

See the lead your team receives

Court-Martial Defense Lead

92/100
High Priority
UCMJ statusCurrent active-duty service member
Case stageCharges referred, Article 32 hearing scheduled
Notified byCID
JurisdictionU.S. Army base, Fort Bragg
GoalReduce punishment / avoid discharge
DeadlineArticle 32 hearing in 12 days
Open to private counselYes, alongside JAG
Delivered to: Email · CRM · SMS notification

From first click to qualified lead

Follow people and businesses seeking counsel through one smooth, guided flow.

They land & meet you

Your video greeting plays instantly — a real face instead of a blank form.

They explain the matter

Smart questions adapt to their matter and capture the full scope.

They share the documents

The facts, dates, and any paperwork come attached, so you can assess the matter before the consultation.

You get a ready lead

Scored and qualified — waiting for you to win it.

Built for court-martial defense workflows

Cliont capabilityCourt-Martial Defense application
Deadline flaggingSurfaces any lead with a hearing, interrogation, or court date inside 30 days ahead of leads with no near-term date, so upcoming Article 32 hearings don't sit in a queue.
Document captureCollects charge sheets and command notification letters at intake so you're not chasing paperwork before assessing whether the matter fits your practice.
Jurisdiction and status screeningConfirms UCMJ status and U.S. military jurisdiction (including overseas bases) up front, filtering out cases outside your authority before you offer a consultation.
CRM routingSends qualified court-martial leads, tagged with case stage and deadline, directly into your CRM instead of a shared inbox.

Common court-martial defense lead scenarios

Charges filed, hearing in 30 days

Charges have already been referred and an Article 32 hearing or trial date sits inside the next month, so the intake pairs the case-stage answer with the deadline flag to surface it immediately.

CID investigation, no charges yet

The service member has been notified of alleged misconduct by CID/NCIS/OSI but no court-martial has been convened, a different signal mix than an active case that still merits attention.

Overseas base jurisdiction question

The alleged conduct happened at an overseas installation, so the intake's jurisdiction question confirms UCMJ authority before the case is treated as in-scope.

Already assigned a JAG lawyer

The person has military-appointed defense counsel but is checking whether they're open to also retaining a private attorney, a distinct fit signal from someone with no counsel at all.

Family member, not a service member

Someone is inquiring on behalf of a relative who isn't subject to the UCMJ, which the intake's first question flags as a lower-fit lead rather than routing it as an active court-martial matter.

Connect Cliont to your workflow

Send leads

HubSpot, HighLevel, Salesforce, JobNimbus

Book matters

Google Calendar, Outlook Calendar, Calendly

Notify your team

Email, SMS, Slack

Automate follow-up

Zapier, Webhooks, API

Simple, transparent pricing

Choose the plan that works for your business.

Most popular

Professional

Unlimited intake forms and leads for your growing business.

$397 / month
14-day free trial · Cancel anytime
  • Unlimited intake forms
  • Custom video greetings
  • AI-powered voice bot
  • English + Spanish support
  • Automatic lead scoring
  • Digital estimates & e-signatures
  • Photo, video & file upload
  • Advanced analytics dashboard
Try free for 14 days

Pay Per Lead

Only pay when you receive a qualified lead.

$47 / qualified lead
No setup fees · No monthly fees
  • Unlimited intake forms
  • Custom video greetings
  • AI-powered voice bot
  • English + Spanish support
  • Automatic lead scoring
  • Digital estimates & e-signatures
  • Photo, video & file upload
  • Charged only for submitted leads
Get started

Court-Martial Defense lead-intake FAQs

Can the intake tell the difference between a pre-charge investigation and an active court-martial?

Yes. The catalog separates a CID/NCIS/OSI notification of alleged misconduct from the question of whether charges have actually been referred to a court-martial or an Article 32 hearing is scheduled, so you can see which stage a case is at before you respond.

Does the intake check jurisdiction for overseas cases?

Yes, one question confirms whether the case is in the United States or falls under U.S. military jurisdiction, including overseas bases, so leads outside your jurisdiction are visible before you book a call.

What happens if a lead already has a JAG-appointed defense lawyer?

The intake asks directly whether the person is willing to speak with a private military defense attorney even if they already have military-appointed counsel, so you can distinguish that lead from someone with no representation at all.

Will the intake flag leads with an imminent hearing or deadline?

Yes, one question asks whether there's a hearing, interrogation, or court date within the next 30 days, and that answer is weighted so time-sensitive cases stand out from ones with no near-term deadline.

What if the person isn't currently or formerly subject to the UCMJ?

The first question in the catalog confirms UCMJ status, and a 'no' answer carries a low weight, so those enquiries are still captured but scored lower than an active service member's case.

Does the intake capture what outcome the person actually wants?

Yes, one question asks whether they're seeking to defend against the charges or reduce potential punishment such as confinement, discharge, or loss of rank/pay, so you know their goal before the consultation.

Turn court-martial defense visitors into qualified cases

Give every court-martial defense visitor a guided intake instead of a dead contact form — and get a scored, qualified lead before you book a consultation.