By the Cliont product team
Fracking worker exposure intake software for TENORM professionals

Fracking worker intake that captures exposure records up front

The intake asks whether your prospective client worked near flowback, produced water, or contaminated scale, confirms a radiation-related diagnosis, and checks for job records or monitoring documentation. Required uploads like medical records and employment history arrive attached before the lead reaches your CRM.

Video greetingGuided intakeDocument uploadInstant lead scoring
Live previewQuestion 1 of 7
Did you work at a hydraulic fracturing site and handle or work near flowback, produced water, scale, or sludge?
Yes
No

The exact intake your fracking hydraulic fracturing worker exposure leads complete

This is the real 7-question guided intake for Fracking Hydraulic Fracturing Worker Exposure — the same flow your customers finish before you ever pick up the phone.

Preview
Your video greeting plays here

What a qualified fracking hydraulic fracturing worker exposure lead should tell you

Screens potential claims from workers exposed to TENORM during hydraulic fracturing operations — through flowback, produced water, scale, or sludge — based on exposure timing, a diagnosed illness, and available employment or monitoring records.

  • Work At Hydraulic Fracturing
  • Exposure Occur Within Last
  • After That Work, Were
  • Have Records Showing Job
  • Illness Cause Medical Treatment,
  • Assigned Clean Tanks, Pipes,
  • Present When Radiation Readings

The questions your team needs answered

Every fracking hydraulic fracturing worker exposure intake asks these — and why each one matters.

QuestionWhy it matters
Did you work at a hydraulic fracturing site and handle or work near flowback, produced water, scale, or sludge?A yes confirms direct contact with flowback, produced water, scale, or sludge — the core exposure pathway this claim type depends on.
Did your exposure occur within the last 10 years while performing job duties at a fracking site?Exposure within the last 10 years keeps the claim inside a realistic window instead of decades-old work that is harder to substantiate.
After that work, were you diagnosed with a radiation-related illness by a licensed medical professional?A licensed diagnosis of a radiation-related illness turns a bare exposure history into a claim with medical causation to evaluate.
Do you have records showing your job duties, work dates, site names, or radiation monitoring tied to the exposure?Records tying job duties, dates, and site names to the exposure make the claim verifiable rather than reliant on memory alone.
Did the illness cause medical treatment, missed work, work restrictions, or lasting symptoms?Documented treatment, missed work, or lasting symptoms show the illness caused real damages worth pursuing.
Were you assigned to clean tanks, pipes, or equipment that contained radioactive scale or residue at the fracking site?Tank and pipe cleaning duties put a worker in direct contact with concentrated radioactive scale, a higher-exposure task than general site labor.
Were you present when radiation readings or contamination warnings were reported at the fracking site during your work shift?Presence during a reported contamination warning suggests the employer's own incident records may corroborate the claimant's exposure.

How Cliont scores fracking hydraulic fracturing worker exposure leads

Every answer is weighted automatically — no manual review required.

Value signals

  • Work At Hydraulic Fracturing: yes
  • Exposure Occur Within Last: yes
  • After That Work, Were: yes
  • Have Records Showing Job: yes
  • Illness Cause Medical Treatment,: yes
  • Assigned Clean Tanks, Pipes,: yes

Urgency signals

  • Work At Hydraulic Fracturing
  • Assigned Clean Tanks, Pipes,

See the lead your team receives

Fracking Worker TENORM Exposure Lead

91/100
High Priority
Worked near flowback, produced water, scale, or sludgeYes
Exposure within last 10 yearsYes
Diagnosed with radiation-related illnessYes
Assigned to clean tanks, pipes, or contaminated equipmentYes
Records tying job duties, dates, or site names to exposureYes
Illness caused medical treatment or missed workYes
Delivered to: Email · CRM

From first click to qualified lead

Follow people and businesses seeking counsel through one smooth, guided flow.

They land & meet you

Your video greeting plays instantly — a real face instead of a blank form.

They explain the matter

Smart questions adapt to their matter and capture the full scope.

They share the documents

The facts, dates, and any paperwork come attached, so you can assess the matter before the consultation.

You get a ready lead

Scored and qualified — waiting for you to win it.

Built for fracking hydraulic fracturing worker exposure workflows

Cliont capabilityFracking Hydraulic Fracturing Worker Exposure application
Video intake widgetLets a claimant describe tank-cleaning duties or a contamination-warning incident in their own words, adding detail behind the yes/no answers to those two catalog questions.
Weighted scoring enginePrioritizes claimants who worked within the last 10 years, have a confirmed diagnosis, and can point to job or monitoring records over a bare exposure claim with none of those.
Document upload captureCollects employment records and medical documentation tied to the diagnosis before the claimant ever books a consultation.
CRM routingSends only leads with a documented exposure pathway and supporting records into your CRM as consultation-ready matters, rather than every inbound inquiry.

Common fracking hydraulic fracturing worker exposure lead scenarios

Recent exposure, diagnosis, records in hand

The claimant worked at a fracking site within the last 10 years, has a documented radiation-related diagnosis, and can point to job records or monitoring data — the intake scores this as ready for a consultation.

Tank and pipe cleaning contact

The claimant was assigned to clean tanks, pipes, or equipment holding radioactive scale, a direct-contact task the intake weights heavily even before a diagnosis is confirmed.

Present during a contamination warning

The claimant was on shift when radiation readings or contamination warnings were reported, giving the claim a documented incident to anchor around rather than a vague recollection of exposure.

Older exposure, thin documentation

The exposure happened more than 10 years ago and the claimant has no job records or monitoring data, so the intake flags it for a lighter-weight follow-up instead of an immediate consultation slot.

Connect Cliont to your workflow

Send leads

HubSpot, HighLevel, Salesforce, JobNimbus

Book matters

Google Calendar, Outlook Calendar, Calendly

Notify your team

Email, SMS, Slack

Automate follow-up

Zapier, Webhooks, API

Simple, transparent pricing

Choose the plan that works for your business.

Most popular

Professional

Unlimited intake forms and leads for your growing business.

$397 / month
14-day free trial · Cancel anytime
  • Unlimited intake forms
  • Custom video greetings
  • AI-powered voice bot
  • English + Spanish support
  • Automatic lead scoring
  • Digital estimates & e-signatures
  • Photo, video & file upload
  • Advanced analytics dashboard
Try free for 14 days

Pay Per Lead

Only pay when you receive a qualified lead.

$47 / qualified lead
No setup fees · No monthly fees
  • Unlimited intake forms
  • Custom video greetings
  • AI-powered voice bot
  • English + Spanish support
  • Automatic lead scoring
  • Digital estimates & e-signatures
  • Photo, video & file upload
  • Charged only for submitted leads
Get started

Fracking Hydraulic Fracturing Worker Exposure lead-intake FAQs

How does the intake tell TENORM exposure apart from general oilfield work?

It asks specifically whether the claimant handled or worked near flowback, produced water, scale, or sludge, and separately whether they were assigned to clean tanks, pipes, or equipment carrying radioactive residue — general labor that never touched those materials scores lower.

Does the intake automatically reject exposure that happened more than 10 years ago?

No. The catalog weights recent exposure (within 10 years) higher, but older exposure still records a score — it just routes as a lower-priority match for review rather than an automatic pass or fail.

What documentation does the intake collect before a claim reaches my CRM?

It requests employment records tying job duties, dates, and site names to the exposure, along with medical records confirming any radiation-related diagnosis and treatment, so you're reviewing a file, not a cold inquiry.

Can the intake still qualify a claimant who hasn't been diagnosed yet?

Yes — the diagnosis question is one weighted factor among several. A claimant without a confirmed diagnosis can still score for consultation if their exposure and job-record answers are strong, just at a lower priority than a diagnosed claim.

How is this different from the intake for equipment maintenance or produced water exposure?

This subservice's catalog is built around fracking-site work specifically — flowback, tank and pipe cleaning, and on-shift contamination warnings. Related exposures like Equipment Maintenance and Cleaning Exposure or Produced Water Handling Exposure run their own separate qualification catalogs.

What happens if a claimant has no records at all?

The intake still captures their exposure and illness answers and scores the lead accordingly — missing records lower the weighted score but don't stop the lead from being delivered to your CRM for your own judgment call.

Turn fracking hydraulic fracturing worker exposure visitors into qualified cases

Give every fracking hydraulic fracturing worker exposure visitor a guided intake instead of a dead contact form — and get a scored, qualified lead before you book a consultation.