Which noncompete leads deserve consultation time
The intake asks whether there's a signed agreement, whether the employer has already threatened enforcement, and whether the restriction is blocking a new job or business — then sends qualified consultations to your CRM with the agreement document attached.
The exact intake your noncompete and non-solicitation agreements leads complete
This is the real 7-question guided intake for Noncompete and Non-Solicitation Agreements — the same flow your customers finish before you ever pick up the phone.
What a qualified noncompete and non-solicitation agreements lead should tell you
Matters where a prospective client is bound by, or facing enforcement of, a noncompete or non-solicitation restriction tied to a U.S. job — including reviewing a new agreement, challenging an existing one, or responding to an employer's demand or lawsuit.
- Situation About Noncompete Or
- Have Written Agreement, Offer
- Restriction Affected Recently Or
- Employer Or Former Employer
- Enforcing Restriction Limit Ability
- Know Name Company That
- Legal Help Review, Challenge,
The questions your team needs answered
Every noncompete and non-solicitation agreements intake asks these — and why each one matters.
| Question | Why it matters |
|---|---|
| Is your situation about a noncompete or non-solicitation restriction tied to a U.S. job (current or past)? | Confirms the matter is a U.S. employment restriction before staff spend time on a dispute that may fall outside the firm's jurisdiction or practice. |
| Do you have a written agreement, offer letter, policy, or other document that includes the restriction (or can you get a copy)? | Whether the client has or can obtain the actual signed document determines how quickly the attorney can assess enforceability rather than working from a secondhand description. |
| Has the restriction affected you recently or is it likely to affect you within the next 6 months (for example, a new job, starting a business, or contacting customers/coworkers)? | A restriction that's already active or about to bite (new job, new business, contacting clients) is far more time-sensitive than one that's purely hypothetical. |
| Has your employer or former employer threatened enforcement or taken action (such as a warning letter, lawsuit, or demand to stop)? | A warning letter, demand, or lawsuit means the clock is running, so this answer should push a lead toward the front of the queue. |
| Would enforcing the restriction limit your ability to earn a living in your field or in the area where you live? | Whether enforcement would actually block the client from earning a living in their field or area speaks directly to the practical stakes of the matter. |
| Do you know the name of the company that is trying to enforce the restriction and the state where you worked for them? | Knowing the company and state lets staff run a conflict check and flag governing-law issues before the consultation is scheduled. |
| Are you looking for legal help to review, challenge, negotiate, or respond to this restriction (instead of only wanting general information)? | Separates prospects who actually want representation from those who only want general information, so consultation slots go to the former. |
How Cliont scores noncompete and non-solicitation agreements leads
Every answer is weighted automatically — no manual review required.
Value signals
- Situation About Noncompete Or: yes
- Have Written Agreement, Offer: yes
- Restriction Affected Recently Or: yes
- Employer Or Former Employer: yes
- Enforcing Restriction Limit Ability: yes
- Know Name Company That: yes
See the lead your team receives
Noncompete Enforcement Lead
From first click to qualified lead
Follow people and businesses seeking counsel through one smooth, guided flow.
They land & meet you
Your video greeting plays instantly — a real face instead of a blank form.
They explain the matter
Smart questions adapt to their matter and capture the full scope.
They share the documents
The facts, dates, and any paperwork come attached, so you can assess the matter before the consultation.
You get a ready lead
Scored and qualified — waiting for you to win it.
Built for noncompete and non-solicitation agreements workflows
| Cliont capability | Noncompete And Non-Solicitation Agreements application |
|---|---|
| Weighted scoring | Leads that have a written agreement, face an active or imminent impact, and have already been threatened with enforcement score highest, so the most time-sensitive noncompete disputes surface first. |
| Document upload | The intake collects the actual agreement, offer letter, or policy document — and any warning letter or demand — before the consultation so the attorney reviews the real language, not a paraphrase. |
| Conflict-check fields | Capturing the former employer's name and the state of employment upfront gives staff what they need to run a conflict check before a consultation is ever booked. |
| Lead routing to CRM | Only prospects who confirm they're seeking help reviewing, challenging, negotiating, or responding to the restriction (not general information) get routed as qualified consultations. |
Common noncompete and non-solicitation agreements lead scenarios
Cease-and-desist already sent
The employer has sent a warning letter or demand and the client has a copy of the signed agreement — this combination scores highest and should reach a consultation quickly.
New job offer at risk
No enforcement action yet, but the restriction is likely to affect the client within six months because of a pending job offer or new venture — worth a proactive review before it becomes a dispute.
No written document to point to
The client believes they're restricted but can't produce or obtain a written agreement, offer letter, or policy — the intake flags this as a weaker file until documentation surfaces.
Information only, not representation
The client wants a general explanation of how noncompetes work rather than help reviewing, challenging, or negotiating one — the intake scores this lower than someone actively seeking representation.
Employment outside the U.S.
The restriction ties to a job outside the U.S. rather than a current or past U.S. position — this answer alone pulls the lead's score down regardless of the other facts.
Connect Cliont to your workflow
Send leads
HubSpot, HighLevel, Salesforce, JobNimbus
Book matters
Google Calendar, Outlook Calendar, Calendly
Notify your team
Email, SMS, Slack
Automate follow-up
Zapier, Webhooks, API
Simple, transparent pricing
Choose the plan that works for your business.
Professional
Unlimited intake forms and leads for your growing business.
- Unlimited intake forms
- Custom video greetings
- AI-powered voice bot
- English + Spanish support
- Automatic lead scoring
- Digital estimates & e-signatures
- Photo, video & file upload
- Advanced analytics dashboard
Pay Per Lead
Only pay when you receive a qualified lead.
- Unlimited intake forms
- Custom video greetings
- AI-powered voice bot
- English + Spanish support
- Automatic lead scoring
- Digital estimates & e-signatures
- Photo, video & file upload
- Charged only for submitted leads
More employment and labor law intake templates
Noncompete and Non-Solicitation Agreements lead-intake FAQs
What if the prospect doesn't have a copy of the actual agreement?
The intake still accepts the submission but records that no document was provided, which lowers the score relative to a lead who has (or can get) the signed agreement, offer letter, or policy.
Does the intake filter out leads that aren't U.S. employment matters?
Yes — the first question asks whether the restriction ties to a current or past U.S. job, and a 'no' answer carries a much lower weight than a 'yes.'
How does the intake treat someone who's already been sued or sent a demand letter?
A 'yes' to whether the employer has threatened enforcement or taken action carries substantial weight, so those leads are prioritized ahead of prospects who haven't heard anything from their employer yet.
Why does the intake ask for the former employer's name and state?
Knowing the company name and the state where the client worked lets your team run a conflict check and get a rough read on which state's law applies before the consultation is even scheduled.
How are people who just want general information handled differently?
The intake separately asks whether the person wants legal help reviewing, challenging, negotiating, or responding to the restriction versus just general information, and weights the two answers differently so information-only requests don't consume consultation slots.
Can this intake be used for both noncompete and non-solicitation matters?
Yes — the questions are written to cover restrictions on competing, soliciting customers, or soliciting former coworkers, so both types of clauses run through the same set of qualifying questions.
Turn noncompete and non-solicitation agreements visitors into qualified cases
Give every noncompete and non-solicitation agreements visitor a guided intake instead of a dead contact form — and get a scored, qualified lead before you book a consultation.