By the Cliont product team
TENORM and radioactive exposure lead intake for legal teams

Which TENORM exposure leads have a doctor-linked diagnosis

The intake walks prospective clients through where the exposure happened, whether it was tied to a job site or facility, and how soon symptoms followed, collecting medical records before a claim ever lands in your CRM.

Video greetingGuided intakeDocument uploadInstant lead scoring
Live previewQuestion 1 of 7
Did the exposure happen in the United States?
Yes
No

The exact intake your tenorm and radioactive exposure leads complete

This is the real 7-question guided intake for TENORM and Radioactive Exposure — the same flow your customers finish before you ever pick up the phone.

Preview
Your video greeting plays here

What a qualified tenorm and radioactive exposure lead should tell you

Screens claims from prospective clients who believe they were exposed to TENORM or other radioactive materials on the job or near an industrial site, and who have since been diagnosed with a health condition that may be connected to that exposure.

  • Exposure Happen In United
  • Personally Exposed Tenorm Or
  • Exposure Occur At Work,
  • Been Diagnosed With Health
  • Diagnosis Or Symptoms Begin
  • Doctor Or Other Medical
  • Exposure Happen Repeatedly Over

The questions your team needs answered

Every tenorm and radioactive exposure intake asks these — and why each one matters.

QuestionWhy it matters
Did the exposure happen in the United States?Jurisdiction carries the heaviest weight in the catalog because exposure outside the US changes whether the claim is viable in the first place.
Were you personally exposed to TENORM or other radioactive materials?This is the only urgent signal in the catalog, since a claim without personal exposure has no foundation regardless of the other answers.
Did the exposure occur at work, on a job site, or near an industrial facility?Confirming the exposure was occupational or site-based ties the claim to a source, which is central to building a viable case.
Have you been diagnosed with a health condition after that exposure?A confirmed diagnosis turns a possible exposure into a claim with an actual injury attached.
Did your diagnosis or symptoms begin within 10 years of the exposure?A diagnosis within 10 years of exposure strengthens the causation timeline that a claim will need to establish.
Has a doctor or other medical professional said your condition may be related to radiation exposure?A medical professional connecting the condition to radiation exposure gives the claim independent support beyond the client's own account.
Did the exposure happen repeatedly over weeks, months, or longer?Repeated exposure over an extended period generally points to a stronger dose history than a single, brief incident.

How Cliont scores tenorm and radioactive exposure leads

Every answer is weighted automatically — no manual review required.

Value signals

  • Exposure Happen In United: yes
  • Personally Exposed Tenorm Or: yes
  • Exposure Occur At Work,: yes
  • Been Diagnosed With Health: yes
  • Diagnosis Or Symptoms Begin: yes
  • Doctor Or Other Medical: yes

Urgency signals

  • Personally Exposed Tenorm Or

See the lead your team receives

TENORM Exposure Lead

91/100
High Priority
Exposure locationUnited States
Personally exposedYes
Exposure settingJob site near industrial facility
Exposure durationRepeated over several years
Diagnosed conditionYes
Diagnosis timingWithin 10 years of exposure
Doctor-linked to radiationYes
Delivered to: Email · CRM · SMS notification

From first click to qualified lead

Follow people and businesses seeking counsel through one smooth, guided flow.

They land & meet you

Your video greeting plays instantly — a real face instead of a blank form.

They explain the matter

Smart questions adapt to their matter and capture the full scope.

They share the documents

The facts, dates, and any paperwork come attached, so you can assess the matter before the consultation.

You get a ready lead

Scored and qualified — waiting for you to win it.

Built for tenorm and radioactive exposure workflows

Cliont capabilityTENORM And Radioactive Exposure application
Weighted scoring engineAggregates answers across US exposure, occupational setting, diagnosis, timing, and doctor-linkage into a single score, so a case missing the diagnosis or causation link doesn't rank the same as a fully documented one.
Guided branching questionsWalks prospective clients through exposure setting, personal exposure, and diagnosis timing in sequence, capturing the exact yes/no answers your catalog scores rather than open-ended descriptions.
Document uploadCollects medical records and employment or site documentation upfront, so you can see whether a diagnosis and exposure history exist before offering a consultation.
CRM routingSends leads with US exposure, occupational setting, and a diagnosed, doctor-linked condition directly to your CRM as high-priority claims, separate from those still missing key causation details.

Common tenorm and radioactive exposure lead scenarios

Oilfield worker with recent diagnosis

US-based, repeated on-site exposure with a diagnosis inside the 10-year window and a doctor noting a possible link scores highest and should route straight to your CRM.

Repeated exposure, no diagnosis yet

Long-term occupational exposure without a confirmed health condition still carries weight from the exposure questions but lacks the diagnosis and doctor-link signals, so it lands lower than an active case.

Exposure occurred outside the US

A prospective client describing exposure abroad answers the jurisdiction question 'no', which drags the score down even if every other exposure detail looks strong.

Inquiring on behalf of a family member

Someone filling out the intake for a relative who wasn't personally exposed triggers a low weight on that question, flagging the lead as a poor fit before you spend consultation time.

Diagnosis decades after exposure

Symptoms that began well outside the 10-year window, with no doctor statement connecting them to radiation, score noticeably lower and surface for closer review rather than automatic priority.

Connect Cliont to your workflow

Send leads

HubSpot, HighLevel, Salesforce, JobNimbus

Book matters

Google Calendar, Outlook Calendar, Calendly

Notify your team

Email, SMS, Slack

Automate follow-up

Zapier, Webhooks, API

Simple, transparent pricing

Choose the plan that works for your business.

Most popular

Professional

Unlimited intake forms and leads for your growing business.

$397 / month
14-day free trial · Cancel anytime
  • Unlimited intake forms
  • Custom video greetings
  • AI-powered voice bot
  • English + Spanish support
  • Automatic lead scoring
  • Digital estimates & e-signatures
  • Photo, video & file upload
  • Advanced analytics dashboard
Try free for 14 days

Pay Per Lead

Only pay when you receive a qualified lead.

$47 / qualified lead
No setup fees · No monthly fees
  • Unlimited intake forms
  • Custom video greetings
  • AI-powered voice bot
  • English + Spanish support
  • Automatic lead scoring
  • Digital estimates & e-signatures
  • Photo, video & file upload
  • Charged only for submitted leads
Get started

TENORM and Radioactive Exposure lead-intake FAQs

How does the intake weigh whether the exposure happened in the United States?

A yes on that question carries the heaviest weight in the catalog, since jurisdiction affects whether a claim is even viable for a US-based case, while a no drops the score sharply.

What if a prospective client isn't certain they were personally exposed to TENORM?

The intake still records a yes or no answer to that question, and because it's flagged as an urgent signal, an uncertain or negative answer meaningfully lowers where the lead lands.

Does it matter if a doctor hasn't yet confirmed the condition is linked to radiation?

That question is scored separately from the diagnosis itself, so a lead can still score reasonably well on exposure and diagnosis details even without a confirmed medical opinion, just lower than one with a doctor's statement.

How does the timing between exposure and diagnosis affect the score?

A diagnosis or symptom onset within 10 years of the exposure adds weight, reflecting the causation timeline questions your intake asks; longer gaps score lower on that factor alone.

Can the intake distinguish a single incident from repeated exposure?

Yes, one question specifically asks whether the exposure happened repeatedly over weeks or months versus a single event, and repeated exposure adds to the total score.

Does this intake also cover related worker exposure types, like fracking or landfill work?

This page is built specifically for the general TENORM and radioactive exposure catalog; occupation-specific intakes exist separately for oil and gas field workers, fracking crews, landfill workers, and other sibling exposure types.

Turn tenorm and radioactive exposure visitors into qualified cases

Give every tenorm and radioactive exposure visitor a guided intake instead of a dead contact form — and get a scored, qualified lead before you book a consultation.