By the Cliont product team
Predictive maintenance lead intake software for industrial maintenance professionals

Know which predictive maintenance leads are worth capability review

Every submission captures the equipment type, current sensor coverage, and asset count buyers want monitored, plus maintenance logs, so you can see failure history and approval authority before you schedule a capability review.

Video greetingGuided intakeFile uploadInstant lead scoring
Live previewQuestion 1 of 7
What type of equipment do you want to monitor?
Rotating machinery (motors, pumps, fans)
Production line equipment
HVAC or utility systems

The exact intake your predictive maintenance leads complete

This is the real 7-question guided intake for Predictive Maintenance — the same flow your customers finish before you ever pick up the phone.

Preview
Your video greeting plays here

What a qualified predictive maintenance lead should tell you

Condition-monitoring programs that use sensors and data analysis to catch equipment problems before failure; qualification centers on how much equipment is in scope, whether monitoring already exists, and whether the contact can approve a new maintenance vendor.

  • Equipment Want Monitor
  • Have Any Sensors Or
  • Many Pieces Equipment Want
  • Experienced Unplanned Equipment Failures
  • Current Status This Facility'S
  • Authorized Approve New Maintenance
  • Would Like This Program

The questions your team needs answered

Every predictive maintenance intake asks these — and why each one matters.

QuestionWhy it matters
What type of equipment do you want to monitor?Equipment type determines which sensor package and technician skill set the capability review needs to prepare.
Do you currently have any sensors or monitoring devices installed on this equipment?Whether sensors already exist changes this from a greenfield install into an integration or expansion project.
How many pieces of equipment do you want to cover with this program?Equipment count is weighted so larger asset counts surface as higher-value program opportunities than small single-machine requests.
Have you experienced unplanned equipment failures in the past year?A yes on recent unplanned failures carries the highest weight because it signals real pain that justifies moving to predictive monitoring now.
What is the current status of this facility's maintenance approach?A reactive maintenance approach is treated as an urgency signal, while facilities already using predictive tools need a different, expansion-focused conversation.
Are you authorized to approve new maintenance programs or vendor services for this facility?Approval authority is weighted heavily because it tells you whether the contact can actually greenlight a program or is only researching on someone else's behalf.
When would you like this program to begin?An immediate start date is treated as an urgency signal that should move the lead ahead of facilities still in the planning stage.

How Cliont scores predictive maintenance leads

Every answer is weighted automatically — no manual review required.

Value signals

  • 1 to 5
  • 6 to 20
  • More than 20
  • Not sure
  • Experienced Unplanned Equipment Failures: yes
  • Authorized Approve New Maintenance: yes

Urgency signals

  • Reactive (fix after failure)
  • Immediately

See the lead your team receives

Predictive Maintenance Lead

91/100
High Priority
Equipment typeRotating machinery (motors, pumps, fans)
Sensors currently installedNo
Equipment count6 to 20
Unplanned failures in past yearYes
Current maintenance approachReactive (fix after failure)
Authorized to approve programYes
Desired startImmediately
Delivered to: Email · CRM · Calendar

From first click to qualified lead

Follow owners and general contractors through one smooth, guided flow.

They land & meet you

Your video greeting plays instantly — a real face instead of a blank form.

They explain the project

Smart questions adapt to their project and capture the full scope.

They add photos & plans

Site photos and plans come attached, so you scope before you bid.

You get a ready lead

Scored and qualified — waiting for you to win it.

Built for predictive maintenance workflows

Cliont capabilityPredictive Maintenance application
Weighted scoring enginePrioritizes leads reporting unplanned failures in the past year and confirmed approval authority, so an authorized buyer with a recent breakdown scores above a browsing contact with no failure history.
Conditional urgency routingFacilities marked as running reactive maintenance and wanting to start immediately are flagged separately from those still in the planning stage, letting your team triage capability reviews by urgency.
Multi-choice equipment taggingBuyers select whether they want rotating machinery, production line equipment, HVAC/utility systems, or electrical systems monitored, so your team can match the right technician before the review call.
Document collection at intakeMaintenance logs and asset details are gathered upfront so your team isn't chasing failure history or equipment lists after the capability review is already booked.

Common predictive maintenance lead scenarios

Reactive plant, recent failures, ready now

The facility is running reactive maintenance, reports unplanned failures in the past year, and wants to start immediately — the intake flags this combination as high urgency and value.

Researching for someone else

The submitter isn't authorized to approve a new maintenance program; the intake still captures equipment type and count so you can loop in the actual decision-maker instead of building a proposal for a dead end.

Large rollout, still in planning

More than 20 pieces of equipment need coverage but the facility hasn't installed sensors and is still in the planning stage, signaling a bigger long-term account that needs a different follow-up cadence than an immediate start.

Expanding an existing predictive program

The facility already uses some predictive tools and has sensors installed, meaning the review conversation is about scaling or integrating rather than an initial pitch on the value of monitoring.

Connect Cliont to your workflow

Send leads

HubSpot, HighLevel, Salesforce, JobNimbus

Book projects

Google Calendar, Outlook Calendar, Calendly

Notify your team

Email, SMS, Slack

Automate follow-up

Zapier, Webhooks, API

Simple, transparent pricing

Choose the plan that works for your business.

Most popular

Professional

Unlimited intake forms and leads for your growing business.

$397 / month
14-day free trial · Cancel anytime
  • Unlimited intake forms
  • Custom video greetings
  • AI-powered voice bot
  • English + Spanish support
  • Automatic lead scoring
  • Digital estimates & e-signatures
  • Photo, video & file upload
  • Advanced analytics dashboard
Try free for 14 days

Pay Per Lead

Only pay when you receive a qualified lead.

$47 / qualified lead
No setup fees · No monthly fees
  • Unlimited intake forms
  • Custom video greetings
  • AI-powered voice bot
  • English + Spanish support
  • Automatic lead scoring
  • Digital estimates & e-signatures
  • Photo, video & file upload
  • Charged only for submitted leads
Get started

Predictive Maintenance lead-intake FAQs

How does the intake separate a serious predictive maintenance lead from someone just browsing options?

The scoring weighs whether the contact has approval authority to sign off on a new maintenance program and whether the facility has had unplanned failures in the past year, so a researcher without either signal scores lower than an authorized buyer with a recent failure.

Does the form tell us if the facility already has sensors or monitoring in place?

Yes — buyers answer directly whether monitoring devices are currently installed, so your team knows before the call if this is a greenfield deployment or an integration with existing hardware.

What happens if a lead fills out the form but can't approve a new vendor?

The lack of approval authority is captured and scored lower than an authorized contact, but the equipment type, count, and current maintenance approach are still collected so you can identify who to loop in.

Can the intake distinguish a small pilot from a plant-wide rollout?

Equipment count is captured as a range from 1 to 5 up through more than 20, with each range weighted, so a five-machine pilot and a plant-wide program surface with different scores.

How does a facility running reactive maintenance get flagged versus one already using preventive or predictive methods?

The current maintenance approach question records whether the facility is reactive, on a scheduled preventive plan, or already using some predictive tools, which changes both the urgency and the pitch your team should prepare.

Is this the right intake if a buyer wants to add sensors to production line equipment specifically, not rotating machinery?

Yes — the equipment type question covers production line equipment, rotating machinery, HVAC/utility systems, electrical systems, and other equipment as separate options, so you see exactly what category the buyer wants covered.

Turn predictive maintenance visitors into qualified projects

Give every predictive maintenance visitor a guided intake instead of a dead contact form — and get a scored, qualified lead before you send an estimator.