Fair Housing Act intake that captures the protected class and harm up
The guided intake asks whether the alleged conduct involved a protected class like disability, familial status, or national origin, confirms the housing transaction and how recently it happened, and collects denial letters or written correspondence before a claim reaches your CRM.
The exact intake your fair housing act claims leads complete
This is the real 7-question guided intake for Fair Housing Act Claims — the same flow your customers finish before you ever pick up the phone.
What a qualified fair housing act claims lead should tell you
Claims that a housing provider — a landlord, seller, lender, HOA, or housing program — treated a prospective client worse because of race, color, national origin, religion, sex, disability, or familial status in connection with renting, buying, financing, or living in a home.
- This Happen In United
- Trying Rent, Buy, Get
- Believe Were Treated Worse
- Housing Provider Something That
- This Happen Within Last
- Know Who Was Responsible
- Have Real Loss Or
The questions your team needs answered
Every fair housing act claims intake asks these — and why each one matters.
| Question | Why it matters |
|---|---|
| Did this happen in the United States or a U.S. territory? | The Fair Housing Act only reaches conduct occurring in the U.S. or a U.S. territory, so this answer is a jurisdictional gate on whether the claim can proceed at all. |
| Were you trying to rent, buy, get a mortgage/loan, get housing help (like Section 8), or live in a home (including dealing with a landlord, HOA, or property manager)? | Confirms the dispute actually arose from a covered housing transaction — renting, buying, financing, or living in a home — rather than an unrelated grievance. |
| Do you believe you were treated worse than others because of your race, color, national origin, religion, sex (including pregnancy or sexual harassment), disability, or because you have children under 18 (familial status)? | A protected-class basis is the core element of an FHA claim; without it, there's no discrimination theory to pursue regardless of how the client was treated. |
| Did the housing provider do something that harmed you (for example, refused to rent/sell, set different terms, denied a reasonable accommodation, steered you, harassed you, or retaliated after you complained)? | Confirms the housing provider took a concrete adverse action, distinguishing an actionable claim from a perceived slight. |
| Did this happen within the last 2 years? | FHA complaints and lawsuits carry filing deadlines, so recency directly affects whether the claim is still timely to pursue. |
| Do you know who was responsible (a landlord, property manager, real estate agent, lender, HOA, or housing program) and have a name or way to identify them? | Knowing the landlord, lender, agent, or HOA responsible is needed to name a respondent, though the claim can still be investigated without it. |
| Did you have a real loss or impact (such as being denied housing, paying more, extra costs, emotional distress, or having to move)? | Documents that the client suffered a real loss or impact, which is generally required to establish damages in a viable claim. |
How Cliont scores fair housing act claims leads
Every answer is weighted automatically — no manual review required.
Value signals
- This Happen In United: yes
- Trying Rent, Buy, Get: yes
- Believe Were Treated Worse: yes
- Housing Provider Something That: yes
- This Happen Within Last: yes
- Know Who Was Responsible: yes
See the lead your team receives
Fair Housing Act Claim — Disability Accommodation Denial
From first click to qualified lead
Follow people and businesses seeking counsel through one smooth, guided flow.
They land & meet you
Your video greeting plays instantly — a real face instead of a blank form.
They explain the matter
Smart questions adapt to their matter and capture the full scope.
They share the documents
The facts, dates, and any paperwork come attached, so you can assess the matter before the consultation.
You get a ready lead
Scored and qualified — waiting for you to win it.
Built for fair housing act claims workflows
| Cliont capability | Fair Housing Act Claims application |
|---|---|
| Weighted scoring engine | Weights the protected-class basis and provider-harm answers heavily, so a claim with a confirmed discriminatory act and real impact outranks one with only a vague grievance. |
| Document upload widget | Collects denial letters, lease or loan paperwork, and correspondence tied to the alleged treatment before the lead is scored and routed. |
| Jurisdiction and timeliness checks | Flags incidents outside the U.S. or older than two years so your team can spot statute-of-limitations issues before offering a consultation. |
| CRM routing | Sends only claims that clear the housing-transaction, protected-class, and harm questions into your CRM, keeping unrelated landlord disputes out of the pipeline. |
Common fair housing act claims lead scenarios
Denied reasonable accommodation
A tenant with a disability was refused an accommodation request by their landlord within the last few months and has the denial in writing. High weight across q003, q004, and q005 pushes this straight into the priority band.
HOA retaliation after a complaint
A family with young children faced new restrictions from their HOA shortly after raising a familial-status concern. The named HOA and recent timeline give this a strong, identifiable-respondent score.
Mortgage denial, respondent unclear
A prospective borrower believes national origin factored into a loan denial but isn't sure which loan officer or underwriter made the call. The claim still scores well on protected class and harm but softer on q006, so it's routed as worth a follow-up rather than top priority.
Incident outside the two-year window
A renter describes discriminatory treatment from over three years ago. A 'no' on q005 lowers the score meaningfully even though the protected-class and harm answers are strong, flagging it for a timeliness check before a consultation is offered.
Connect Cliont to your workflow
Send leads
HubSpot, HighLevel, Salesforce, JobNimbus
Book matters
Google Calendar, Outlook Calendar, Calendly
Notify your team
Email, SMS, Slack
Automate follow-up
Zapier, Webhooks, API
Simple, transparent pricing
Choose the plan that works for your business.
Professional
Unlimited intake forms and leads for your growing business.
- Unlimited intake forms
- Custom video greetings
- AI-powered voice bot
- English + Spanish support
- Automatic lead scoring
- Digital estimates & e-signatures
- Photo, video & file upload
- Advanced analytics dashboard
Pay Per Lead
Only pay when you receive a qualified lead.
- Unlimited intake forms
- Custom video greetings
- AI-powered voice bot
- English + Spanish support
- Automatic lead scoring
- Digital estimates & e-signatures
- Photo, video & file upload
- Charged only for submitted leads
More civil rights and constitutional law intake templates
View all civil rights and constitutional law intake templates →
Fair Housing Act Claims lead-intake FAQs
How does the intake separate a Fair Housing Act claim from an ordinary landlord dispute?
The intake asks whether the situation involved a housing transaction (renting, buying, financing, or a landlord/HOA relationship) and whether the treatment was tied to a protected class like race, disability, or familial status. A dispute lacking either element scores well below claims where both are confirmed.
What happens if the prospective client can't identify who was responsible?
The intake still captures the claim, but not knowing the landlord, agent, lender, or HOA lowers the score relative to a claim with a named respondent, since that detail is needed to name a party in a complaint or suit.
Does the intake screen out incidents that happened outside the U.S.?
Yes. The Fair Housing Act only applies within the United States and its territories, so a 'no' on that question drags the score down significantly since it signals the matter falls outside FHA jurisdiction.
Why does the timing question matter so much for scoring?
Housing discrimination claims carry filing deadlines — a HUD complaint is generally time-limited, and federal court claims face a statute of limitations — so an incident inside the last two years scores considerably higher than one outside it.
Can this intake distinguish Fair Housing Act claims from ADA accessibility or Section 1983 matters?
Yes, the questions are specific to housing transactions and the protected classes covered under the Fair Housing Act, so they won't misclassify an accessibility complaint better suited to ADA Title II and III Accessibility or a government-actor claim better suited to Section 1983 Civil Rights Claims.
What documentation does the intake ask for before a claim reaches my CRM?
It requests denial letters or written notices from the housing provider, lease or loan paperwork, and any correspondence showing the alleged discriminatory treatment, so you have a documentation trail before offering a consultation.
Turn fair housing act claims visitors into qualified cases
Give every fair housing act claims visitor a guided intake instead of a dead contact form — and get a scored, qualified lead before you book a consultation.