See which Davis-Bacon wage claims have the paperwork to prove it
The intake walks prospective clients through project funding, hourly-pay status, and how much they believe they were underpaid, then collects pay stubs, contracts, or texts before the matter lands in your CRM.
The exact intake your prevailing wage and davis-bacon leads complete
This is the real 7-question guided intake for Prevailing Wage and Davis-Bacon — the same flow your customers finish before you ever pick up the phone.
What a qualified prevailing wage and davis-bacon lead should tell you
A wage dispute involving construction work performed on a government-funded or government-owned project, where the worker may have been paid less than the prevailing wage rate required under Davis-Bacon or a state equivalent.
- Issue About Pay Construction
- Work On Government-Funded Or
- Paid By Hour (Or
- Think Were Paid Less
- Underpayment Happen Within Last
- Have Any Records That
- Identify Company That Paid
The questions your team needs answered
Every prevailing wage and davis-bacon intake asks these — and why each one matters.
| Question | Why it matters |
|---|---|
| Is your issue about pay for construction work you did in the United States? | Confirms the dispute is actually about pay for U.S. construction work, filtering out matters outside this practice area before any other question is asked. |
| Did you work on a government-funded or government-owned project (federal, state, county, city, school, or public agency)? | Government funding is the legal trigger for prevailing wage and Davis-Bacon coverage, so a 'no' here usually means the claim isn't viable under this framework. |
| Were you paid by the hour (or should you have been), rather than being paid a fixed total price as an independent business? | Distinguishes hourly wage workers covered by prevailing wage rules from independent contractors paid a fixed price, who typically fall outside the protection. |
| Do you think you were paid less than the required wage rate for your job on that project (including required fringe benefits)? | Captures the core of the claim itself — a believed shortfall against the required rate and fringe benefits is what makes this a wage claim at all. |
| Did the underpayment happen within the last 3 years? | A shortfall outside the three-year window may raise statute-of-limitations concerns worth flagging before offering time on a consultation. |
| Do you have any records that could support your claim (such as pay stubs, time sheets, a contract, texts/emails, or the project name and location)? | The presence of pay stubs, timesheets, a contract, or correspondence determines how quickly and credibly the underpayment can be established. |
| Can you identify the company that paid you (or the contractor/subcontractor you worked for) on the project? | Being able to name the paying contractor or subcontractor determines whether there's an identifiable party to pursue the claim against. |
How Cliont scores prevailing wage and davis-bacon leads
Every answer is weighted automatically — no manual review required.
Value signals
- Issue About Pay Construction: yes
- Work On Government-Funded Or: yes
- Paid By Hour (Or: yes
- Think Were Paid Less: yes
- Underpayment Happen Within Last: yes
- Have Any Records That: yes
See the lead your team receives
Prevailing Wage Underpayment Lead
From first click to qualified lead
Follow people and businesses seeking counsel through one smooth, guided flow.
They land & meet you
Your video greeting plays instantly — a real face instead of a blank form.
They explain the matter
Smart questions adapt to their matter and capture the full scope.
They share the documents
The facts, dates, and any paperwork come attached, so you can assess the matter before the consultation.
You get a ready lead
Scored and qualified — waiting for you to win it.
Built for prevailing wage and davis-bacon workflows
| Cliont capability | Prevailing Wage And Davis-Bacon application |
|---|---|
| Weighted scoring engine | Scores each lead using government-funding status, hourly-pay classification, believed wage shortfall, the three-year timing window, and whether records or a named contractor exist. |
| Conditional question branching | If the issue isn't about pay for construction work in the U.S., the intake can end the flow early instead of walking the person through the remaining prevailing wage questions. |
| Document upload widget | Collects pay stubs, time sheets, a contract, or texts/emails before the consultation, so you can gauge how provable the wage shortfall is before you talk to the client. |
| CRM routing rules | Sends claims with a government project, hourly pay, a believable shortfall, and supporting records to the CRM as priority matters, while thinner claims still arrive but flagged for follow-up. |
Common prevailing wage and davis-bacon lead scenarios
Documented public-project underpayment
A laborer on a federally funded school project was paid hourly, believes they were shorted on the required wage plus fringe benefits within the last three years, and has pay stubs and the subcontractor's name ready to go.
Suspects shortfall, no paperwork
A worker believes they were underpaid on a government job but has no pay stubs, time sheets, or contract, and can't confirm which subcontractor issued their pay — the intake still captures the claim but flags it as thin on evidence.
Private project, no Davis-Bacon coverage
The caller feels underpaid, but the job was for a private developer with no government funding, so the prevailing wage requirement never attached regardless of how the hours were paid.
Paid a flat price, not hourly
Someone worked on a public job but was paid a fixed total as their own business rather than by the hour, which puts them outside the hourly-wage classification the claim depends on.
Underpayment from years ago
The alleged shortfall happened more than three years back, raising a statute-of-limitations question the intake surfaces before any consultation time is spent.
Connect Cliont to your workflow
Send leads
HubSpot, HighLevel, Salesforce, JobNimbus
Book matters
Google Calendar, Outlook Calendar, Calendly
Notify your team
Email, SMS, Slack
Automate follow-up
Zapier, Webhooks, API
Simple, transparent pricing
Choose the plan that works for your business.
Professional
Unlimited intake forms and leads for your growing business.
- Unlimited intake forms
- Custom video greetings
- AI-powered voice bot
- English + Spanish support
- Automatic lead scoring
- Digital estimates & e-signatures
- Photo, video & file upload
- Advanced analytics dashboard
Pay Per Lead
Only pay when you receive a qualified lead.
- Unlimited intake forms
- Custom video greetings
- AI-powered voice bot
- English + Spanish support
- Automatic lead scoring
- Digital estimates & e-signatures
- Photo, video & file upload
- Charged only for submitted leads
More construction law intake templates
Prevailing Wage and Davis-Bacon lead-intake FAQs
How does the intake screen out workers on private projects?
The intake asks directly whether the work was on a government-funded or government-owned project, since prevailing wage and Davis-Bacon requirements only apply to public work — a 'no' answer signals the matter likely isn't covered.
What happens if a prospective client suspects underpayment but doesn't know the exact rate?
The intake only asks whether they believe they were paid less than the required rate, including fringe benefits, so a general suspicion is enough to move the lead forward for your review.
Does the intake catch claims that might already be time-barred?
Yes — it asks whether the underpayment occurred within the last three years, which lets you spot potential statute-of-limitations issues before offering a consultation.
What if the client has no pay stubs, contract, or timesheets?
The intake asks about supporting records directly, so a claim with no documentation still comes through, but it's clearly marked as lacking the evidence a claim like this usually needs.
Can the intake tell the difference between an hourly employee and an independent contractor?
It asks whether the person was paid hourly or should have been, versus paid a fixed total as their own business, which helps separate covered wage workers from those likely outside Davis-Bacon protection.
What if the caller can't name the contractor who paid them?
The intake asks whether they can identify the paying company or contractor, which matters because a claim without an identifiable payer is harder to pursue even if the underpayment itself sounds credible.
Turn prevailing wage and davis-bacon visitors into qualified cases
Give every prevailing wage and davis-bacon visitor a guided intake instead of a dead contact form — and get a scored, qualified lead before you book a consultation.