Confirm vessel ownership and privity before the consultation
The intake asks whether the incident happened on navigable waters, whether the prospect owns the vessel, and whether they were personally operating it or aware of the unsafe condition, then collects incident reports and any claim letters before the file reaches your CRM.
The exact intake your limitation of liability actions leads complete
This is the real 7-question guided intake for Limitation of Liability Actions — the same flow your customers finish before you ever pick up the phone.
What a qualified limitation of liability actions lead should tell you
A federal court proceeding where a vessel owner facing a claim for injury, death, cargo loss, pollution, or property damage seeks to cap their liability at the value of the vessel, provided the loss occurred without the owner's privity or knowledge.
- Issue Related Accident Or
- Owner Boat/Ship, Or Company
- Someone Made Claim Against
- Incident Happen Within Last
- Not Personally Operating Boat/Ship
- Believe Incident Was Not
- Know Boat/Ship Involved And
The questions your team needs answered
Every limitation of liability actions intake asks these — and why each one matters.
| Question | Why it matters |
|---|---|
| Is your issue related to an accident or claim involving a boat or ship on navigable waters (like an океan, gulf, major river, or coastal waterway) in the United States? | Admiralty jurisdiction over navigable waters is the threshold requirement before a limitation action is even available. |
| Are you the owner of the boat/ship, or a company that owns it? | Only a vessel owner (or an owner pro hac vice) can petition to limit liability, so non-owners are the wrong prospect for this filing. |
| Has someone made a claim against you (or threatened to) for injuries, death, property damage, cargo loss, pollution, or other losses from that incident? | A limitation action only makes sense once there is an actual or threatened claim to limit exposure against. |
| Did the incident happen within the last 6 months, or did you first receive written notice of a claim within the last 6 months? | The six-month figure tracks the statutory clock that typically starts running from written notice of a claim. |
| Were you not personally operating the boat/ship at the time of the incident (for example, it was being run by a captain, crew, renter, or another operator)? | Whether the owner was personally at the helm feeds directly into the privity-or-knowledge analysis that decides if limitation applies. |
| Do you believe the incident was not caused by something you personally knew about or personally directed (for example, you were not aware of the unsafe condition or did not order it)? | This is the core legal standard for the whole action: an owner with privity or knowledge of the cause typically cannot limit liability. |
| Do you know the boat/ship involved and can you identify its owner and basic details (name/registration, where it is, and what happened)? | Basic vessel and owner identification is what the attorney needs before running a conflict check and drafting the petition. |
How Cliont scores limitation of liability actions leads
Every answer is weighted automatically — no manual review required.
Value signals
- Issue Related Accident Or: yes
- Owner Boat/Ship, Or Company: yes
- Someone Made Claim Against: yes
- Incident Happen Within Last: yes
- Not Personally Operating Boat/Ship: yes
- Believe Incident Was Not: yes
Urgency signals
- Issue Related Accident Or
- Believe Incident Was Not
See the lead your team receives
Limitation of Liability Action Lead
From first click to qualified lead
Follow people and businesses seeking counsel through one smooth, guided flow.
They land & meet you
Your video greeting plays instantly — a real face instead of a blank form.
They explain the matter
Smart questions adapt to their matter and capture the full scope.
They share the documents
The facts, dates, and any paperwork come attached, so you can assess the matter before the consultation.
You get a ready lead
Scored and qualified — waiting for you to win it.
Built for limitation of liability actions workflows
| Cliont capability | Limitation Of Liability Actions application |
|---|---|
| Weighted scoring engine | Automatically discounts leads where the prospect admits personal knowledge or direct operation, since those answers undercut the privity-or-knowledge basis for the entire action. |
| Conditional question branching | Only surfaces the ownership and privity questions once navigable-waters jurisdiction and an actual or threatened claim are confirmed, so unrelated boating disputes exit early. |
| Deadline-aware urgency flagging | Treats a claim notice received inside the last six months as time-sensitive, since it may be tied to the statutory filing window for a limitation petition. |
| Document upload widget | Collects incident reports, claim letters, and vessel documentation upfront so the attorney can assess ownership and notice timing before the first call. |
Common limitation of liability actions lead scenarios
Claim received within the deadline
An owner got written notice of a claim within the past few months and was not personally at the helm when the incident occurred, so the intake flags the filing window and the no-privity answer together for priority follow-up.
Notice window already expired
The claim letter arrived well over six months ago, which lowers the score since the petition deadline tied to that notice date may already have passed.
Owner had actual knowledge
The prospect admits they personally directed the condition that caused the loss, which weakens the privity-or-knowledge defense the whole action depends on and scores lower even with a valid claim.
Incident on non-navigable water
The event happened on a private lake rather than a covered waterway, so the intake catches the negative answer on jurisdiction before any consultation is booked.
Multiple claims from one incident
One casualty produced separate claims for injury, cargo loss, and pollution against the same vessel owner, which the intake surfaces as a higher-value, multi-claim limitation matter worth the attorney's time.
Connect Cliont to your workflow
Send leads
HubSpot, HighLevel, Salesforce, JobNimbus
Book matters
Google Calendar, Outlook Calendar, Calendly
Notify your team
Email, SMS, Slack
Automate follow-up
Zapier, Webhooks, API
Simple, transparent pricing
Choose the plan that works for your business.
Professional
Unlimited intake forms and leads for your growing business.
- Unlimited intake forms
- Custom video greetings
- AI-powered voice bot
- English + Spanish support
- Automatic lead scoring
- Digital estimates & e-signatures
- Photo, video & file upload
- Advanced analytics dashboard
Pay Per Lead
Only pay when you receive a qualified lead.
- Unlimited intake forms
- Custom video greetings
- AI-powered voice bot
- English + Spanish support
- Automatic lead scoring
- Digital estimates & e-signatures
- Photo, video & file upload
- Charged only for submitted leads
More maritime and admiralty law intake templates
Limitation of Liability Actions lead-intake FAQs
What happens if the claim was made more than six months ago?
The intake still records the answer, but a notice date outside the six-month window scores lower because the deadline to file a limitation petition typically runs from that written notice, so the case may need a quicker legal read rather than a standard consultation slot.
Does the form check who was actually running the vessel?
Yes, it asks whether the prospect was personally operating the boat or ship at the time of the incident, since that fact underpins the owner's privity-or-knowledge defense.
How does the intake handle privity or knowledge?
One question asks whether the prospect believes the incident was not caused by something they personally knew about or directed, which is the core legal standard for whether liability can be limited at all.
Do prospects need to have already been sued to qualify?
No. The catalog question covers claims that have been made or merely threatened, so a prospect who only received a demand letter still routes through as a live matter.
Can the intake filter out incidents that aren't in admiralty jurisdiction?
Yes, the first question checks whether the incident occurred on navigable waters such as an ocean, gulf, major river, or coastal waterway, which is the jurisdictional trigger for a limitation action.
What if the prospect doesn't know much about the vessel or the other party?
The catalog asks whether the prospect can identify the vessel and its owner, and a 'no' here signals the file may need more fact-gathering before it's ready for a consultation.
Turn limitation of liability actions visitors into qualified cases
Give every limitation of liability actions visitor a guided intake instead of a dead contact form — and get a scored, qualified lead before you book a consultation.