By the Cliont product team
student loan dispute lead intake software for consumer law firms

Confirm real harm and prior servicer contact before you consult

The intake asks whether the loan is in their name or they're a co-signer, whether the servicer error caused real financial harm, and whether they've already tried to resolve it directly — then collects statements and correspondence before sending qualified disputes to your CRM.

Video greetingGuided intakeDocument uploadInstant lead scoring
Live previewQuestion 1 of 7
Are you dealing with a problem or dispute about a student loan (federal or private) in the United States?
Yes
No

The exact intake your student loan disputes leads complete

This is the real 7-question guided intake for Student Loan Disputes — the same flow your customers finish before you ever pick up the phone.

Preview
Your video greeting plays here

What a qualified student loan disputes lead should tell you

A dispute between a borrower (or co-signer) and a federal or private student loan servicer over billing errors, misapplied payments, unexpected fees, or incorrect default/delinquency reporting — as opposed to a claim against the school itself.

  • Dealing With Problem Or
  • Loan In Name, Or
  • In Last 24 Months,
  • Been Harmed By Issue
  • Know Name Loan Servicer,
  • Already Tried Fix Problem
  • This Dispute Mainly About

The questions your team needs answered

Every student loan disputes intake asks these — and why each one matters.

QuestionWhy it matters
Are you dealing with a problem or dispute about a student loan (federal or private) in the United States?Confirms the dispute is actually about a U.S. federal or private student loan before any other qualification is asked.
Is the loan in your name, or are you a co-signer who is being asked to pay?Tells you whether you're dealing with the actual borrower or a co-signer being pressed for payment, which changes who has standing and what relief is available.
In the last 24 months, have you had an issue like wrong balance, wrong payment posting, unexpected fees/interest, or incorrect delinquency/default reporting on your student loan?Identifies whether there's a concrete servicing error within the recent window, which is the factual basis most student loan disputes need to proceed.
Have you been harmed by the issue (for example, you paid extra money, were denied a benefit/forgiveness, or your credit was hurt)?Separates a real, actionable harm (money lost, benefit denied, credit hurt) from a suspicion or inconvenience with no damages to pursue.
Do you know the name of the loan servicer, lender, or debt collector involved (or can you find it on statements or your credit report)?Knowing the servicer, lender, or collector name means intake and case prep can start immediately instead of spending consultation time identifying the right party.
Have you already tried to fix the problem by contacting the servicer/lender (by phone, email, online message, or dispute) and it was not resolved?A documented, unresolved attempt to fix the issue directly with the servicer strengthens the case and shows the dispute isn't a simple misunderstanding.
Is this dispute mainly about a school’s conduct (like misleading enrollment promises) rather than the loan servicer/lender’s handling of the loan?If the real complaint is about the school's enrollment conduct rather than the servicer's handling of the loan, it usually points toward a different kind of claim and scores lower here.

How Cliont scores student loan disputes leads

Every answer is weighted automatically — no manual review required.

Value signals

  • Dealing With Problem Or: yes
  • Loan In Name, Or: yes
  • In Last 24 Months,: yes
  • Been Harmed By Issue: yes
  • Know Name Loan Servicer,: yes
  • Already Tried Fix Problem: yes

Lower-fit signals

  • This Dispute Mainly About: no

See the lead your team receives

Student Loan Dispute Lead

91/100
High Priority
Loan ownershipBorrower (primary, not co-signer)
Issue typeIncorrect payment posting and unexpected fees
Harm reportedPaid extra money; credit score affected
Servicer knownYes, named on statement
Prior contact with servicerYes, disputed twice, unresolved
Dispute focusServicer handling, not school conduct
Delivered to: Email · CRM · SMS notification

From first click to qualified lead

Follow people and businesses seeking counsel through one smooth, guided flow.

They land & meet you

Your video greeting plays instantly — a real face instead of a blank form.

They explain the matter

Smart questions adapt to their matter and capture the full scope.

They share the documents

The facts, dates, and any paperwork come attached, so you can assess the matter before the consultation.

You get a ready lead

Scored and qualified — waiting for you to win it.

Built for student loan disputes workflows

Cliont capabilityStudent Loan Disputes application
Weighted lead scoringConfirmed harm and an unresolved prior contact attempt with the servicer push a lead's score up, while a school-conduct complaint pulls it down, so consultations get booked on the disputes most likely to have merit.
Document upload captureProspective clients are prompted to attach loan statements, servicer correspondence, or a credit report before submitting, giving your intake team the paper trail on file day one.
CRM routingDisputes that clear the servicer-identification and harm questions are sent straight to your CRM as qualified leads, separate from school-conduct complaints that score lower.
Video intake widgetA prospective client can describe a wrong-balance or misapplied-payment issue on camera, giving your team more context than a form field before the first call.

Common student loan disputes lead scenarios

Misapplied payments, credit damage

The borrower reports wrong balances or payment posting errors, confirms the mistake hurt their credit, and knows the servicer's name — this stacks nearly every high-value signal in the catalog.

Co-signer pursued after default

A parent or relative co-signed the loan and is now being pressed for payment; the intake flags them as the responsible party even though the loan isn't in their name.

Unresolved after direct contact

The prospective client already called or disputed with the servicer and got nowhere, which the intake treats as a stronger signal than someone who hasn't tried yet.

School conduct, not servicer error

The complaint centers on misleading enrollment promises rather than how the loan is being serviced — the intake scores this lower since it points away from a servicer/lender dispute.

Suspects a problem, can't identify harm

Someone believes something is wrong with their account but hasn't been able to point to a financial loss, denied benefit, or credit hit yet, which lowers the lead's score relative to a confirmed-harm case.

Connect Cliont to your workflow

Send leads

HubSpot, HighLevel, Salesforce, JobNimbus

Book matters

Google Calendar, Outlook Calendar, Calendly

Notify your team

Email, SMS, Slack

Automate follow-up

Zapier, Webhooks, API

Simple, transparent pricing

Choose the plan that works for your business.

Most popular

Professional

Unlimited intake forms and leads for your growing business.

$397 / month
14-day free trial · Cancel anytime
  • Unlimited intake forms
  • Custom video greetings
  • AI-powered voice bot
  • English + Spanish support
  • Automatic lead scoring
  • Digital estimates & e-signatures
  • Photo, video & file upload
  • Advanced analytics dashboard
Try free for 14 days

Pay Per Lead

Only pay when you receive a qualified lead.

$47 / qualified lead
No setup fees · No monthly fees
  • Unlimited intake forms
  • Custom video greetings
  • AI-powered voice bot
  • English + Spanish support
  • Automatic lead scoring
  • Digital estimates & e-signatures
  • Photo, video & file upload
  • Charged only for submitted leads
Get started

Student Loan Disputes lead-intake FAQs

Does the intake distinguish federal loans from private loans?

The first question confirms it's a dispute about a federal or private student loan in the U.S. before anything else is asked, so you're not spending time on loans outside that scope.

How does the intake handle co-signers instead of the actual borrower?

One question specifically asks whether the loan is in the prospective client's name or whether they're a co-signer being asked to pay, so you can see collector-pressure-on-a-co-signer cases before the consultation.

What happens if the complaint is really about the school, not the servicer?

That's flagged as a lower-fit signal in the catalog — if the dispute is mainly about a school's enrollment conduct rather than how the loan is being handled, the lead scores lower so you can route it elsewhere or deprioritize it.

Do I still get leads who haven't contacted the servicer yet?

Yes — prior contact attempts add weight to the score but aren't required to pass through, so someone with a fresh, unresolved issue can still reach your CRM.

What if the prospective client doesn't know who their servicer is?

The intake asks whether they know the servicer, lender, or collector name, or can find it on a statement or credit report; not knowing lowers the score slightly but doesn't disqualify the lead outright.

How is this different from your Debt Collection Defense intake?

This subservice's catalog is built around loan-specific issues — balance errors, forgiveness denials, credit reporting harm — rather than collection-lawsuit or collector-conduct questions used on the Debt Collection Defense page.

Does the intake ask about financial harm specifically?

Yes — a dedicated question asks whether they paid extra money, were denied a benefit or forgiveness, or had their credit hurt, and it carries one of the higher weights in the scoring model.

Turn student loan disputes visitors into qualified cases

Give every student loan disputes visitor a guided intake instead of a dead contact form — and get a scored, qualified lead before you book a consultation.