Maritime arbitration intake that flags the arbitration clause up front
The intake asks whether the dispute involves ocean or water transport, whether an arbitration clause applies, and whether your prospective client is actually a party to the contract — then routes only qualified matters to your CRM. Contract copies and correspondence get collected up front so you're not scoping a case blind on the call.
The exact intake your maritime arbitration leads complete
This is the real 7-question guided intake for Maritime Arbitration — the same flow your customers finish before you ever pick up the phone.
What a qualified maritime arbitration lead should tell you
Resolution of a maritime contract or commercial dispute — such as a charter, cargo, vessel-services, or marine-insurance dispute — through a private arbitration process rather than court litigation, typically triggered by an arbitration clause in the underlying agreement.
- Issue Dispute Related Ocean
- There Contract Or Written
- Contract Include Arbitration Clause
- Party Contract (Or Authorized
- Amount At Stake Or
- Know Who Other Party
- Dispute Arise Within Last
The questions your team needs answered
Every maritime arbitration intake asks these — and why each one matters.
| Question | Why it matters |
|---|---|
| Is your issue a dispute related to ocean or water transportation or maritime business (such as a shipping contract, charter, cargo, vessel services, or marine insurance)? | Confirms the matter is genuinely maritime in nature, filtering out land-based contract disputes that don't belong in an admiralty arbitration practice. |
| Is there a contract or written agreement involved in the dispute? | A written agreement is usually the basis for any arbitration obligation, so this separates documented disputes from informal disagreements. |
| Does the contract include an arbitration clause or does the other side claim the dispute must be handled through arbitration? | An existing arbitration clause is the clearest signal the matter is actually headed to arbitration rather than litigation. |
| Are you a party to the contract (or an authorized representative of a company that is a party)? | Confirms standing — a caller with no contractual relationship to the dispute isn't a viable arbitration client regardless of the facts. |
| Is the amount at stake or the impact on your business significant (for example, at least $25,000 or a major operational disruption)? | Filters out disputes too small to justify the cost and time of an arbitration proceeding. |
| Do you know who the other party is (company/person) and how to contact them? | Knowing the other party's identity and contact details indicates the dispute is concrete and ready to be pursued, not speculative. |
| Did the dispute arise within the last 6 years (or is it still ongoing)? | Checks whether the dispute falls within a workable time window before the firm commits to reviewing it. |
How Cliont scores maritime arbitration leads
Every answer is weighted automatically — no manual review required.
Value signals
- Issue Dispute Related Ocean: yes
- There Contract Or Written: yes
- Contract Include Arbitration Clause: yes
- Party Contract (Or Authorized: yes
- Amount At Stake Or: yes
- Know Who Other Party: yes
Urgency signals
- Issue Dispute Related Ocean
See the lead your team receives
Maritime Arbitration Lead
From first click to qualified lead
Follow people and businesses seeking counsel through one smooth, guided flow.
They land & meet you
Your video greeting plays instantly — a real face instead of a blank form.
They explain the matter
Smart questions adapt to their matter and capture the full scope.
They share the documents
The facts, dates, and any paperwork come attached, so you can assess the matter before the consultation.
You get a ready lead
Scored and qualified — waiting for you to win it.
Built for maritime arbitration workflows
| Cliont capability | Maritime Arbitration application |
|---|---|
| Automated lead scoring | Weighs a confirmed arbitration clause and confirmed contracting-party status heavily, so a lead with both surfaces at the top of your queue instead of buried with disputes that lack either. |
| Conditional branching | If a prospective client answers 'no' to the dispute being maritime-related, the intake can shortcut the remaining arbitration-specific questions instead of walking them through a full contract and clause review. |
| Document upload capture | Collects the contract or charter party agreement and any correspondence referencing the arbitration clause before the consultation, so you're reviewing the actual language rather than a paraphrase. |
| CRM routing | Sends disputes that confirm a written contract, an arbitration clause, and standing straight to your CRM as high-priority, while low-value or non-party enquiries land in a lower tier for later review. |
Common maritime arbitration lead scenarios
Charter dispute with clear arbitration clause
The prospective client has a signed charter party with an arbitration clause, knows the other party, and cites a six-figure dispute — the intake surfaces all of this as a strong candidate for a paid consultation.
Cargo claim with no written contract
A shipper describes cargo damage but there's no signed agreement in place, which pulls the score down since a contract carries far more weight than a verbal understanding.
Caller isn't actually a contracting party
Someone downstream of the actual charterer or shipper — say, a customer of the cargo owner — reaches out about a dispute they're not a party to, which the intake flags as a weak fit.
Low-value disagreement over minor charges
A dispute exists and there's a contract, but the amount at stake is small and there's no major operational disruption, so the lead scores lower on impact even though the maritime nature is confirmed.
Old dispute nearing the time limit
The disagreement first arose more than six years ago, which the intake flags separately from active disputes so you can weigh limitations exposure before booking time.
Connect Cliont to your workflow
Send leads
HubSpot, HighLevel, Salesforce, JobNimbus
Book matters
Google Calendar, Outlook Calendar, Calendly
Notify your team
Email, SMS, Slack
Automate follow-up
Zapier, Webhooks, API
Simple, transparent pricing
Choose the plan that works for your business.
Professional
Unlimited intake forms and leads for your growing business.
- Unlimited intake forms
- Custom video greetings
- AI-powered voice bot
- English + Spanish support
- Automatic lead scoring
- Digital estimates & e-signatures
- Photo, video & file upload
- Advanced analytics dashboard
Pay Per Lead
Only pay when you receive a qualified lead.
- Unlimited intake forms
- Custom video greetings
- AI-powered voice bot
- English + Spanish support
- Automatic lead scoring
- Digital estimates & e-signatures
- Photo, video & file upload
- Charged only for submitted leads
More maritime and admiralty law intake templates
Maritime Arbitration lead-intake FAQs
How does the intake tell whether a dispute is actually headed to arbitration versus court?
It directly asks whether the contract contains an arbitration clause or whether the other side is claiming arbitration applies — that single answer carries some of the heaviest weight in the scoring model.
What happens if the prospective client isn't sure their contract has an arbitration clause?
The intake still records their answer and routes the lead through, but a 'no' or uncertain response scores lower than a confirmed clause, so you can see at a glance how firm the arbitration basis is before you engage.
Does the intake filter out callers who aren't actually a party to the contract?
Yes — it asks whether the person is a party to the contract or an authorized representative of one, and a 'no' answer drops the score sharply since standing is a threshold issue in arbitration matters.
How are small-dollar disputes handled differently from major ones?
The intake asks whether the amount at stake or business impact is significant (for example, $25,000 or more), and that answer feeds directly into whether the lead lands as high priority or a lower-tier follow-up.
What if the client doesn't know how to reach the other party?
The intake still accepts the lead, but not knowing the other party's identity or contact details scores lower, since it signals the dispute may be less developed or harder to act on quickly.
Can this intake also handle related matters like charter party disputes or cargo claims?
Maritime Arbitration is its own subservice here; charter party disputes and cargo damage and loss are separate sibling intakes with their own question sets, so a lead that turns out to be a cargo claim without an arbitration clause is better suited to that page.
Turn maritime arbitration visitors into qualified cases
Give every maritime arbitration visitor a guided intake instead of a dead contact form — and get a scored, qualified lead before you book a consultation.